Dental Materials
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 123-132 , February 2012

Finite element analysis of bonded model Class I ‘restorations’ after shrinkage

  • Flávia P. Rodrigues

      Affiliations

    • Biomaterials Research Group, School of Denstistry, Anhanguera-Bandeirante University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Anhanguera-Bandeirante University of São Paulo, School of Dentistry, R. Maria Cândida, 1813 Bloco G, 6th Floor, V. Guilherme 02071-013, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Tel.: +55 11 2967 9058; mobile: +55 11 9492 1334.
    • ,
  • Nick Silikas

      Affiliations

    • Biomaterials Science Research Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    • ,
  • David C. Watts

      Affiliations

    • Biomaterials Science Research Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
    • Institute of Materials Science (IMT), Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, D-07743 Jena, Germany
    • ,
  • Rafael Y. Ballester

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Received 18 September 2010 ,Revised 30 September 2011 ,Accepted 1 October 2011.

References 

  1. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL. Thermal expansion coefficient of dental composites measured with strain gauges. Dent Mater. 1996;12:290–294
  2. Ensaff H, O’Doherty DM, Jacobsen PH. The influence of the restoration-tooth interface in light cured composite restorations: a finite element analysis. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3097–3103
  3. Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL, Rengo S. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar,restored with adhesive resin-based composites. J Biomech. 2001;34:1269–1277
  4. Jantarat J, Palamara JE, Messer HH. An investigation of cuspal deformation and delayed recovery after occlusal loading. J Dent. 2001;29:363–370
  5. Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater. 2005;21:36–42
  6. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater. 2004;20:554–564
  7. Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater. 2004;20:535–542
  8. De Jager N, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. The apparent increase of the Young's modulus in thin cement layers. Dent Mater. 2004;20:457–462
  9. Alster D, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater. 1997;13:146–150
  10. Braga RR, Ferracane JL. Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15:176–184
  11. Watts DC, Marouf AS, Al-Hindi AM. Photo-polymerization shrinkage-stress kinetics in resin-composites: methods development. Dent Mater. 2003;19:1–11
  12. Watts DC, Satterthwaite JD. Axial shrinkage-stress depends upon both C-factor and composite mass. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1–8
  13. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1636–1639
  14. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res. 1989;68:48–50
  15. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1990;6:167–171
  16. Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2005;
  17. Stansbury J, Trujillo-Lemon M, Lu H, Ding X, Lin Y, Ge J. Conversion-dependent shrinkage stress and strain in dental resins and composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:56–67
  18. Laughlin GA, Williams JL, Eick JD. The influence of system compliance and sample geometry on composite polymerization shrinkage stress. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:671–678
  19. Alster D, Venhoven BA, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of compliance of the substrate materials on polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers. Biomaterials. 1997;18:337–341
  20. Fleming GJ, Hall DP, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values. J Dent. 2005;33:139–146
  21. Abbas G, Fleming GJ, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent. 2003;31:437–444
  22. Jantarat J, Panitvisai P, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Comparison of methods for measuring cuspal deformation in teeth. J Dent. 2001;29:75–82
  23. Meredith N, Setchell DJ. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent. 1997;25:331–337
  24. Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations—a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2002;18:295–303
  25. Barink M, Van der Mark PC, Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N. A three-dimensional finite element model of the polymerization process in dental restorations. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1427–1435
  26. Katona TR, Winkler MM, Huang J. Stress analysis of a bulk-filled Class-V chemical-cured dental composite restoration. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;31:445–449
  27. Kinomoto Y, Torii M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Polymerization contraction stress of resin composite restorations in a model Class I cavity configuration using photoelastic analysis. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12:309–319
  28. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses?. J Dent Res. 1996;75:871–878
  29. Miguel A, de la Macorra JC. A predictive formula of the contraction stress in restorative and luting materials attending to free and adhered surfaces, volume and deformation. Dent Mater. 2001;17:241–246
  30. Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson CL, Watts DC. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Dent Mater. 2004;20:862–872
  31. Arola D, Galles LA, Sarubin MF. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations. J Dent. 2001;29:63–73
  32. Hubsch PF, Middleton J, Knox J. A finite element analysis of the stress at the restoration-tooth interface, comparing inlays and bulk fillings. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1015–1019
  33. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The effect of interfacial failure around a class V composite restoration analysed by the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:111–116
  34. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues VI. Forces developing in direct-filling materials during hardening. J Am Dent Assoc. 1967;74:439–445
  35. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. Modelling the effects of enamel anisotropy with the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22:451–454
  36. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:131–140

PII: S0109-5641(11)00864-5

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.001

Dental Materials
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 123-132 , February 2012

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution