Dental Materials
Volume 26, Issue 10 , Pages 993-1000 , October 2010

Clinical performance of cervical restorations—A meta-analysis

  • Siegward D. Heintze

      Affiliations

    • R&D, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Preclinical Research, R&D, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Bendererstrasse 2, FL-9494 Schaan, Liechtenstein. Tel.: +423 235 3570; fax: +423 233 1279.
    • ,
  • Christiane Ruffieux

      Affiliations

    • Biostatistics Unit, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
    • ,
  • Valentin Rousson

      Affiliations

    • Biostatistics Unit, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Received 4 November 2009 ,Revised 26 February 2010 ,Accepted 16 June 2010.

References 

  1. Wood I, Jawad Z, Paisley C, Brunton P. Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: a literature review. J Dent. 2008;36:759–766
  2. Michael JA, Townsend GC, Greenwood LF, Kaidonis JA. Abfraction: separating fact from fiction. Aust Dent J. 2009;54:2–8
  3. Bader JD, Levitch LC, Shugars DA, Heymann HO, McClure F. How dentists classified and treated non-carious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993;124:46–54
  4. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21:864–881
  5. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Lindberg A. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1101–1107
  6. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215–235
  7. van Dijken JWV. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater. 2000;16:285–291
  8. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:63–70
  9. American Dental Association - Council on Scientific Affairs. Dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Acceptance program. Guidelines. Chicago: ADA; 2001.
  10. Berthold M. Seal changes: new professional product evaluation program planned. ADA News. 2004;35:25
  11. Heintze SD, Blunck U, Gohring TN, Rousson V. Marginal adaptation in vitro and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. Dent Mater. 2009;25:605–620
  12. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials (Science Committee Project 2/98—FDI World Dental Federation). J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(Suppl. 1):121–147
  13. Duke ES, Lindemuth J. Variability of clinical dentin substrates. Am J Dent. 1991;4:241–246
  14. Duke ES, Robbins JW, Snyder DS. Clinical evaluation of a dentinal adhesive system: three-year results. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:889–895
  15. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent. 2008;33:370–378
  16. van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of four dentin bonding agents in Class V abrasion lesions: a four-year follow-up. Dent Mater. 1994;10:319–324
  17. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. Am J Dent. 1991;4:247–250
  18. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC, Ritter AV. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results. Oper Dent. 2003;28:482–487
  19. Raskin A, Setcos JC, Vreven J, Wilson NH. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4:148–152
  20. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Quintessence Int. 1999;30:607–614

PII: S0109-5641(10)00162-4

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.06.003

Dental Materials
Volume 26, Issue 10 , Pages 993-1000 , October 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution