Dental Materials
Volume 26, Issue 4 , Pages 353-359, April 2010

Impact of replacing Bis-GMA and TEGDMA by other commercially available monomers on the properties of resin-based composites

Heinrich-Heine-University, Medical Faculty, Centre of Dentistry, Dept. of Operative and Preventive Dentistry and Endodontics, Düsseldorf, Germany

Received 5 June 2009; received in revised form 22 October 2009; accepted 9 December 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

To evaluate important material properties of six experimental resin-based restorative materials (EXP) with systematically modified resin matrices using conventional and alternative monomers in comparison with an experimental standard (ST).

Materials and methods Commercially available monomers were selected according to their molecular weight, functionality, viscosity, and polymerization shrinkage. ST, 71wt% filler, matrix UDMA/Bis-GMA/TTEGDMA and six EXPs with modified organic matrices but the same filler content were manufactured. Flexural strength, flexural modulus, water sorption, solubility and polymerization shrinkage of all EXPs were measured and compared with the results of ST.

Results

ANOVA (p<0.05) revealed significant differences among the materials and all investigated properties. Bis-GMA and UDMA were substituted by alternative monomers without losing flexural strength or modulus. Replacing the diluting monomer TTEGDMA with alternative monomers resulted in increased flexural strength. None of the experimental products with modified matrices showed increased water sorption or solubility but some even performed better than ST. Increased hygroscopic expansion and reduced shrinkage were achieved using a very hydrophilic monomer but no significant differences of water sorption and solubility in comparison with ST were found.

Conclusion

The results indicated that there are monomers commercially available providing the same or even better properties than conventional matrices.

Keywords: Dentistry, Resin-based restorative material, New monomers, Physical properties, Mechanical properties

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(09)00510-7

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.006

Dental Materials
Volume 26, Issue 4 , Pages 353-359, April 2010