Dental Materials
Volume 26, Issue 4 , Pages 288-294, April 2010

Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experimental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content

  • Milena Cadenaro

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Dental Sciences and Biomaterials, Department of Biomedicine, University of Trieste, Italy
  • ,
  • Francesca Antoniolli

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Dental Sciences and Biomaterials, Department of Biomedicine, University of Trieste, Italy
  • ,
  • Barbara Codan

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Dental Sciences and Biomaterials, Department of Biomedicine, University of Trieste, Italy
  • ,
  • Kelli Agee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
  • ,
  • Franklin R. Tay

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
  • ,
  • Elettra De Stefano Dorigo

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Dental Sciences and Biomaterials, Department of Biomedicine, University of Trieste, Italy
  • ,
  • David H. Pashley

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
  • ,
  • Lorenzo Breschi

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Dental Sciences and Biomaterials, Department of Biomedicine, University of Trieste, Italy
    • IGM-CNR, Unit of Bologna c/o IOR, Bologna, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Dental Sciences and Biomaterials, Clinica Stomatologica, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospedale, 1, I-34129 Trieste, Italy. Tel.: +39 0403992192; fax: +39 0403992665.

Received 18 June 2009; received in revised form 10 November 2009; accepted 16 November 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the curing reaction of five experimental adhesive blends containing different photo-initiating systems. The hypothesis tested was that degree of conversion (DC) of resin blends is affected by resin type, solvent content and photo-initiating system.

Methods

The experimental methacrylate resin blends were ranked from hydrophobic (R2) to hydrophilic (R3 and R4) and tested as neat, or solvated with 10% or 20% ethanol, or 10% ethanol and 10% water. Three different photo-initiators were used: IS-1=0.25% CQ (camphorquinone)+1% EDMAB (ethyl 4-dimethylaminobenzoate); IS-2=1.25% TPO (diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phosphine oxide); IS-3=0.25% CQ+0.50% EDMAB+0.50% TPO. DC of resin blends was measured with a differential scanning calorimeter. Data were analyzed with a three-way ANOVA.

Results

Neat resin type influenced DC, as R4 showed the highest values compared to R2 and R3 (p<0.05). Solvent had a significant effect on DC (p<0.05): dilution of resin blends with 10% or 20% ethanol or 10% ethanol+10% water increased the DC of all resins, except for R4. Initiators influenced the polymerization since neat resins and mixtures solvated with 10% or 20% ethanol showed their highest DC values when polymerized with IS-1 or IS-3 (p>0.05), while IS-2 or IS-3 increased the DC values of resins diluted with 10% ethanol and 10% water (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Water-compatible photo-initiators such as TPO should be included in the hydrophilic solvated adhesive formulation to ensure an appropriate DC of the adhesive layer.

Keywords: Dentin-bonding agents, Degree of conversion, Initiators, Hydrophilicity, Solvent

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(09)00423-0

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.078

Dental Materials
Volume 26, Issue 4 , Pages 288-294, April 2010