Dental Materials
Volume 26, Issue 3 , Pages 242-248 , March 2010

Strength of the bond as a predictor of marginal performance: An in vitro evaluation of contemporary adhesives

  • Tissiana Bortolotto

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cariology and Endodontology, School of Dentistry, University of Geneva, 19, Rue Barthélemy-Menn, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +41 22 379 40 76; fax: +41 22 379 41 02.
    • ,
  • Antonella Mileo

      Affiliations

    • Erasmus Program, Division of Cariology and Endodontology, School of Dentistry, University of Geneva, 19, Rue Barthélemy-Menn, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland
    • ,
  • Ivo Krejci

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cariology and Endodontology, School of Dentistry, University of Geneva, 19, Rue Barthélemy-Menn, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland

Received 8 July 2008 ,Revised 16 September 2009 ,Accepted 5 November 2009.

References 

  1. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies on dental restorative materials. Science committee Project 2/98 - FDI World Dental Federation. Study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:121–147
  2. Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Marins de Carvalho R. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage. J Dent. 2005;33:603–610
  3. Guzman-Ruiz S, Armstrong SR, Cobb DS, Vargas MA. Association between microtensile bond strength and leakage in the indirect resin composite/dentin adhesively bonded joint. J Dent. 2001;29:145–153
  4. Prati C, Simpson M, Mitchem J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Relationship between bond strength and microleakage measured in the same class I restorations. Dent Mater. 1992;8:37–41
  5. Guzmàn-Armstrong S, Armstrong SR, Qian F. Relationship between nanoleakage and microtensile bond strength at the resin–dentin interface. Oper Dent. 2003;28:60–66
  6. Okuda M, Pereira PNR, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Relationship between nanoleakage and long-term durability of dentin bonds. Oper Dent. 2001;26:482–490
  7. Okuda M, Pereira PNR, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Long-term durability of resin dentin interface: nanoleakage vs microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent. 2002;27:289–296
  8. Sauro S, Pashley DH, Montanari M, Chersoni S, Carvalho RM, Toledano M, et al. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2007;23:705–713
  9. Paul SJ, Welter DA, Ghazi M, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage at the dentin adhesive interface vs microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent. 1999;24:181–188
  10. Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Relationship between bond strengths and nanoleakage: evaluation of a new assessment method. Am J Dent. 2001;14:100–104
  11. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russel CM. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage at the dentin/restoration interface. Am J Dent. 1994;7:44–46
  12. Moll K, Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. In vitro comparison of dentin bonding systems: effect of testing method and operator. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:845–852
  13. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984;63:1396–1399
  14. Krejci I, Häusler T, Sägesser D, Lutz F. New adhesives in class V restorations under combined load and simulated dentinal fluid. Dent Mater. 1994;10:331–335
  15. Bortolotto T, Ferrari M, Tay F, Krejci I. Degradation of thermo-mechanically loaded Class V restorations after 18 months of water storage. Am J Dent. 2007;20:83–89
  16. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites: strength of the bond to dentin versus surface energy parameters. Dent Mater. 2005;21:1039–1043
  17. Palmer DS, Barco MT, Billy EJ. Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:325–327
  18. Krejci I. Zahnfarbene restaurationen. Qualität, Potential und Indicationen. München, Wien: Carl Hanser Verlag; 1992;p. 87
  19. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang Q, Laffon JE. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-steps, total-etch 2-steps, self-etch 2-steps and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding systems through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5:47–56
  20. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H. In vitro degradation of resin–dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3795–3803
  21. De Munck J. An in vitro study on the durability of biomaterial-tooth bonds. PhD thesis, Belgium: Catholic University of Leuven; 2004.
  22. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin–dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1385–1391
  23. Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F. Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res. 1993;72:490–495
  24. Hashimoto M, De Munck J, Ito S, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H, et al. In vitro effect of nanoleakage expression on resin–dentin bond strength analysed by microtensile bond test, SEM/EDX and TEM. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5565–5574
  25. Abo T, Uno S, Sano H. Comparison of bonding efficacy of all-in-one adhesive with a self-etching primer system. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112:286–292
  26. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, et al. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005;84:183–188
  27. Asmussen E. Composite restorative resins composition versus wall-to-wall polymerisation contraction. Acta Odontol Scand. 1975;33:337–344
  28. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose?. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:57–67

PII: S0109-5641(09)00336-4

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.001

Dental Materials
Volume 26, Issue 3 , Pages 242-248 , March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution