Dental Materials
Volume 26, Issue 3 , Pages 207-214 , March 2010

Cyclic loading of notched dental composite specimens

  • Lihong Lin
    • ,
  • James L. Drummond

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Restorative Dentistry m/c 555, University of Illinois at Chicago, 350 College of Dentistry, 801 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL 60612-7212, USA. Tel.: +1 312 996 2669; fax: +1 312 996 3535.

Received 21 September 2009 ,Accepted 4 October 2009.

References 

  1. Köhler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent. 2000;8:111–116
  2. Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent. 2001;29:317–324
  3. Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater. 2006;76:114–120
  4. Drummond JL, Lin L, Miescke KJ. Evaluation of fracture toughness of a fiber containing dental composite after flexural fatigue. Dent Mater. 2004;20:591–599
  5. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater. 1992;8:290–295
  6. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, Al-Dhamadi YA, Silikas N, Watts DC. In vitro characterization of two laboratory-processed resin composites. Dent Mater. 2003;19:393–398
  7. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:386–395
  8. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Mechanical properties of heat treated restorative resins for use in the inlay/onlay technique. Scand J Dent Res. 1990;98:564–567
  9. Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK. Static and fatigue compression test for particulate filler composite resin with fiber-reinforced composite substructure. Dent Mater. 2007;23:17–23
  10. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical relevance of laboratory fatigue studies. J Dent. 1994;22:97–102
  11. Abe Y, Braem MJ, Lambrechts P, Inoue S, Takeuchi M, Van Meerbeek B. Fatigue behavior of packable composites. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3405–3409
  12. ASTM PS070-97 . Standard test methods for the determination of fracture toughness of advanced ceramics at ambient temperature. 1997;
  13. Lin L. The effects of cyclic fatigue on the fracture toughness of dental composites. Master Thesis Oral Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2009.
  14. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. JADA. 2003;134:1382–1390
  15. Papadogiannis DY, Lakes RS, Papadogiannis Y, Palaghias G, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M. The effect of temperature on the viscoelastic properties of nano-hybrid composites. Dent Mater. 2008;24:257–266
  16. Drummond JL, Lin L, Al-Turki LI, Hurley RJ. Fatigue behavior of dental composite materials. J Dent. 2009;37(5):321–330
  17. Moore BK, Oshida Y. Materials science and technology in dentistry. In:  Wise DL,  Trantolo DJ,  Altobelli DE,  Yaszemski MJ,  Gresser JD,  Schwartz ER editor. Encyclopedic handbook of biomaterials and bioengineering, Part B: Applications. vol. 2:New York: Derker; 1995;p. 1325–1430
  18. Al-Turki LI. Contact cyclic loading of restorative composites. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago; 2007.
  19. Takeshige F, Kawakami Y, Hayashi M, Ebisu S. Fatigue behavior of resin composites in aqueous environments. Dent Mater. 2007;23:893–899
  20. Lohbauer U, von der Horst T, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Flexural fatigue behavior of resin composite dental restoratives. Dent Mater. 2003;19:435–440
  21. Draughn RA. Compressive fatigue limits of composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1979;58:1093–1096

PII: S0109-5641(09)00320-0

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.10.002

Dental Materials
Volume 26, Issue 3 , Pages 207-214 , March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution