Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 7 , Pages 852-856 , July 2009

Polymerization contraction stress in resin–tooth bonds under hydrated and dehydrated conditions

  • Masanori Hashimoto

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, School of Dentistry, 1757 Kanazawa, Ishikari-Tobetsu, Hokkaido 061-0293, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81 133 23 1211; fax: +81 133 23 1669.
    • ,
  • Kouichi Nakamura

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Hokkaido University, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
    • ,
  • Albert J. Feilzer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands

Received 7 April 2008 ,Revised 17 September 2008 ,Accepted 12 January 2009.

References 

  1. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic?. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:726–731
  2. Tay FR, Frankenberger R, Krejci I, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, et al. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence. J Dent. 2004;32:611–621
  3. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonka B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu CK, et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6449–6459
  4. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PNR, Kanemura N, Morigami M, Tagami J, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999;78:906–911
  5. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Tay FR, Kaga M, Kudou Y, et al. Micromorphological changes in resin–dentin bonds after 1 year of water storage. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:306–311
  6. Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Pashley DH, Peters MC, Lai SCN, Yiu CKY, et al. Aging affects two modes of nanoleakage expression in bonded dentin. J Dent Res. 2003;82:537–541
  7. De Munck Y, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, et al. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 2003;82:136–140
  8. Donmez N, Belli S, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Ultrastructural correlates of in vivo/in vitro bond degradation in self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005;84:355–359
  9. Hashimoto M, Ito S, Tay FR, Svizero NR, Sano H, Kaga M, et al. Fluid movement across the resin–dentin interface during and after bonding. J Dent Res. 2004;83:843–848
  10. Hashimoto M, de Gee AJ, Kaga M, Feilzer AJ. Contraction stress in dentin adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 2006;85:728–732
  11. Hashimoto M, de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization contraction stress in dentin adhesives bonded to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1304–1310
  12. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Hiraishi N, Imazato S, Rueggeberg FA, Salz U, et al. Tubular occlusion prevents water-treeing and through-and-through fluid movement in a single-bottle, one-step self-etch adhesive model. J Dent Res. 2005;84:891–896
  13. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1636–1639
  14. Watts DC, Marouf AS, Al-Hindi AM. Photo-polymerization shrinkage-stress kinetics in resin-composites: methods development. Dent Mater. 2003;19:1–11
  15. Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater. 2005;21:36–42
  16. Bolhuis HPB, de Gee AJ, Kleverlaan CJ, El Zohairy AA, Feilzer AJ. Contraction stress and bond strength to dentin for compatible and incompatible combinations of bonding systems and chemical and light-cured core build-up resin composites. Dent Mater. 2006;22:223–233
  17. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent. 1999;27:523–530
  18. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II. Etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001;17:430–444
  19. Van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. In:  Summitt JB,  Robbins JW,  Schwartz RS editor. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. A contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2001;p. 178–235
  20. Perdigão J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitao J, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent. 1997;10:141–146
  21. Hannig M, Bock H, Bott B, Hoth-Hannig W. Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:464–470
  22. Sattabanasuk V, Vachiramon V, Qian F, Armstrong SR. Resin–dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. J Dent. 2007;35:467–475
  23. Ogata M, Harada N, Yamagichi S, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Tagami J. Effects of different burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching primer bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2001;26:375–382
  24. Aguilar-Mendoza JA, Rosales-Leal JI, Rodríguez-Valverde MA, Cabrerizo-Vílchez MA. Effect of acid etching on dentin wettability and roughness: self-etching primers versus phosphoric acid. J Biomed Mater Res. 2008;84:277–285
  25. Yiu CKY, King NM, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Carrilho MR, et al. Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5789–5796
  26. Hashimoto M, Fujita S, Kaga M, Yawaka Y. Effect of water on bonding of one-bottle self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2008;27:172–178

PII: S0109-5641(09)00007-4

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.005

Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 7 , Pages 852-856 , July 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution