Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 7 , Pages 845-851 , July 2009

Effect of thermal cycling on flexural properties of carbon–graphite fiber-reinforced polymers

  • Susanna Segerström

      Affiliations

    • NIOM, Nordic Institute of Dental Materials, Haslum, Norway
    • Division of Dental Biomaterials, Institute of Odontology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
    • ,
  • I. Eystein Ruyter

      Affiliations

    • NIOM, Nordic Institute of Dental Materials, P.O. Box 70, N-1305 Haslum, Norway
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +47 67 512209; fax: +47 67 591530.

Received 17 March 2008 ,Accepted 29 December 2008.

References 

  1. Palmer DS, Barco MT, Billy EJ. Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:325–327
  2. Stinchcomb WW, Reifsnider KL, Marcus LA, Williams RS. Effects of frequency on the mechanical response of two composite materials to fatigue loads. In: Fatigue of composite materials. vol. 569:ASTM-STP; 1975;p. 115–129
  3. Ruyter IE, Ekstrand K, Björk N. Development of carbon/graphite fiber-reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) suitable for implant-fixed dental bridges. Dent Mater. 1986;2:6–9
  4. Ekstrand K, Ruyter IE, Wellendorf H. Carbon/graphite fiber-reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate): properties under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;21:1065–1080
  5. Vallittu PK, Ruyter IE, Ekstrand K. Effect of water storage on the flexural properties of E-glass and silica fiber acrylic resin composite. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:340–350
  6. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced composite using a vacuum/pressure or a manual adaptation manufacturing process. J Dent. 2000;28:509–514
  7. Miettinen VM, Narva KK, Vallittu PK. Water sorption, solubility and effect of post-curing of glass fibre reinforced polymers. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1187–1194
  8. Beech DR, Brown D. The role of the filler–matrix interface in composite restorative materials based on poly(methyl methacrylate). Br Dent J. 1972;133:297–300
  9. Segerström S, Ruyter IE. Mechanical and physical properties of carbon–graphite fiber-reinforced polymers intended for implant suprastructures. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1150–1156
  10. Bouillaguet S, Schütt A, Alander P, Schwaller P, Buerki G, Michler J, et al. Hydrothermal and mechanical stresses degrade fiber–matrix interfacial bond strength in dental fiber-reinforced composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;76:98–105
  11. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Chazot C, Handel G. Glass–fibre-reinforced-composite fixed partial dentures on dental implants. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:895–902
  12. Björk N, Ekstrand K, Ruyter IE. Implant-fixed, dental bridges from carbon/graphite fibre reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate). Biomaterials. 1986;7:73–75
  13. Bergendal T, Ekstrand K, Karlsson U. Evaluation of implant-supported carbon/graphite fiber-reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) prostheses: a longitudinal multicenter study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 1995;6:246–253
  14. Segerström S, Meriç G, Knarvang T, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of two matrix materials intended for fiber reinforced polymers. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:422–428
  15. Vallittu PK. A review of fiber-reinforced denture base resins. J Prosthodont. 1996;5:270–276
  16. Kanayama H, Kanie T, Inoue K. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of photo-activated composite resins containing short glass fibres. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:1034–1041
  17. Delmonte J. Technology of carbon and graphite fiber composites. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company; 1981;p. 198–245, 233
  18. Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten-Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts: mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;104:605–611
  19. Drummond JL, Bapna MS. Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resin. Dent Mater. 2003;19:226–231
  20. Lassila LVJ, Tanner J, Le Bell A-M, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater. 2004;20:29–36
  21. Lehmann F, Eickemeyer G, Rammelsberg P. Fracture resistance of metal-free composite crowns—effects of fiber reinforcement, thermal cycling and cementation technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:258–264
  22. ISO 6344-1 . Coated abrasives—grain size analysis. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1998;p. 1–6
  23. Khaled SM, Sui R, Charpentier PA, Rizkalla AS. Synthesis of TiO2–PMMA nanocomposite; using methacrylic acid as a coupling agent. Langmuir. 2007;23:3988–3995
  24. Minford JD. Adhesives. In:  Kinloch AJ editors. Durability of structural adhesives. New York: Applied Science Publishers Ltd.; 1983;p. 135–137
  25. Lee H, Orlowsky JA. Adhesive dental composite restoratives—a monograph on their theory and clinical applications. South El Monte, CA: Lee Pharmaceuticals; 1974;p. 4–5
  26. Wolf K, Fornes RE, Memory JD, Gilbert RD. A review of interfacial phenomena in graphite fiber composites. In:  Thrower PA editors. Chemistry and physics of carbon. vol. 18:New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 1982;p. 94–96
  27. Meric G, Ruyter IE. Effect of thermal cycling on composites reinforced with two differently sized silica–glass fibers. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1157–1163
  28. Agarwal BD, Broutman LJ, Chandrashekhara K. Analysis and performance of fiber composites. 3rd ed.. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; 2006;
  29. Schreiber CK. Polymethylmethacrylate reinforced with carbon fibres. Br Dent J. 1971;130:29–30
  30. Knoell A, Maxwell H, Bechtol C. Graphite fiber reinforced bone cement: an experimental feasibility investigation. Ann Biomed Eng. 1975;3:225–229
  31. Yazdanie N, Mahood M. Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: an investigation of transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:543–547
  32. Vallittu PK, Lassila VP. Reinforcement of acrylic resin denture base material with metal or fibre strengtheners. J Oral Rehabil. 1992;19:225–230
  33. Murphy J. Reinforced plastics handbook. 2nd ed.. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.; 1998;p. 63–106
  34. Vallittu PK. Effect of 180-week water storage on the flexural properties of E-glass and silica fiber acrylic resin composite. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:334–339
  35. Vallittu PK. Effect of 10 years of in vitro aging on the flexural properties of fiber-reinforced resin composites. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:43–45
  36. Kinloch AJ. Adhesives. In:  Kinloch AJ editors. Durability of structural adhesives. New York: Applied Science Publishers Ltd.; 1983;p. 12–7.

PII: S0109-5641(09)00006-2

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.12.007

Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 7 , Pages 845-851 , July 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution