Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 5 , Pages 605-620 , May 2009

Marginal adaptation in vitro and clinical outcome of Class V restorations

  • S.D. Heintze

      Affiliations

    • R&D, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Bendererstrasse 2, FL-9494 Schaan, Liechtenstein
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +423 235 3570; fax: +423 233 1279.
    • ,
  • U. Blunck

      Affiliations

    • Charité Berlin, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental School, Berlin, Germany
    • ,
  • T.N. Göhring

      Affiliations

    • University of Zurich, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Clinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Zurich, Switzerland
    • ,
  • V. Rousson

      Affiliations

    • Biostatistics Unit, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Received 21 July 2008 ,Accepted 10 November 2008.

References 

  1. ISO. Dental materials—testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Technical Specification; 2003. No. 11405.
  2. Heintze SD. Systematic reviews: (1) The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. (2) The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(Suppl 1):77–106
  3. Schuckar M, Geurtsen W. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:766–775
  4. Dietrich T, Krämer M, Lösche GM, Wernecke KD, Roulet JF. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations. Oper Dent. 2000;25:401–410
  5. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Cavalleri A. Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers—comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10:259–267
  6. Raskin A, D’Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Dejou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:295–308
  7. Raskin A, Tassery H, D’Hoore W, Gonthier S, Vreven J, Degrange M, et al. Influence of the number of sections on reliability of in vitro microleakage evaluations. Am J Dent. 2003;16:207–210
  8. Raskin A, Courson F, Nanc J, Droz D, Muller-Boll M, Bouter D, et al. In vitro microleakage multicentered study of two sealants. J Dent Res 2005;84(Spec Issue B):Abstract No. 213 (Continental European and Scandinavian Divisions) (www.dentalresearch.org).
  9. Henisch G. Ein computergestütztes System zur Erfassung und Verwaltung von Messdaten im Rahmen der quantitativen Randanalyse am Rasterelektronenmikroskop. Berlin: Free University; 1989;
  10. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Jakob G. Automatic gap detection at restoration margins with an optical sensor in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:95–105
  11. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Roulet JF. Automated margin analysis of contemporary adhesive systems in vitro—evaluation of discriminatory variables. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:359–369
  12. Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F. Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res. 1993;72:490–494
  13. Peters O, Göhring TN, Lutz F. Effect of eugenol-containing sealer on marginal adaptation of dentine-bonded resin fillings. Int Endod J. 2000;33:53–59
  14. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. In- Vitro- Testverfahren zur Evaluation Dentaler Restaurationssysteme 1. Computergesteuerter Kausimulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100:953–960
  15. Blunck U, Roulet JF. In vitro marginal quality of dentin-bonded composite resins in Class V cavities. Quintessence Int. 1989;20:407–412
  16. Blunck U, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of compomer Class V restorations in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:143–151
  17. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A. Retention of restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions after centric and eccentric occlusal loading in a chewing simulator—a pilot study. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8:169–174
  18. Blunck U, Zaslansky P. Effectiveness of all-in-one adhesive systems tested by thermocycling following short and long-term water storage. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(Suppl 2):231–240
  19. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:5–33
  20. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21:864–881
  21. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2006;34:97–105
  22. Peumans M, Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:512–518
  23. Perdigão J, Carmo AR, Geraldeli S. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:253–258
  24. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-Vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation dentaler Restaurationssysteme. Korrelation mit In-vivo-Resultaten. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100:1445–1449
  25. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Seven-year clinical effectiveness of two 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesives. J Dent Res 2005;84(Spec Issue B):Abstract No. 147 (Continental European and Scandinavian Divisions) (www.dentalresearch.org).
  26. Van Dijken JW, Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Lindberg A. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions—A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1101–1107
  27. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84:118–132
  28. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Smale I. A radiographic and scanning electron microscopic study of approximal margins of Class II resin composite restorations placed in vivo. J Dent. 1998;26:319–327
  29. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:185–194
  30. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R, Gaebler P. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations—a 10-year report. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:991–1000
  31. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Reich SM. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro?. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(Suppl 1):107–116
  32. Sarrett DC. Prediction of clinical outcomes of a restoration based on in vivo marginal quality evaluation. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(Suppl 1):117–120
  33. Kidd EA, Beighton D. Prediction of secondary caries around tooth-colored restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res. 1996;75:1942–1946
  34. Mjör IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int. 1998;29:313–317
  35. Alhadainy HA, Abdalla AI. 2-Year clinical evaluation of dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1996;9:77–79
  36. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:775–784
  37. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:311–322
  38. Van Dijken JW. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent. 2004;17:27–32
  39. Abdalla AI, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in Class V non-carious lesions. Am J Dent. 2006;19:289–292
  40. Dalton Bittencourt D, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD. An 18-months’ evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005;63:173–178
  41. Türkün LS. Clinical performance of a new antibacterial adhesive system at 18-months. J Dent Res 2004;86(Spec Issue A):Abstract No. 0226 (www.dentalresearch.org).
  42. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent. 2008;33:370–378
  43. Schattenberg A, Werling U, Willershausen B, Ernst CP. Two-year clinical performance of two one-step self-etching adhesives in the restoration of cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12:225–232
  44. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ, Mercante DE, et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as Class V filling materials. Oper Dent. 2005;30:275–281
  45. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli PV, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two etch & rinse adhesives in cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2004;29:376–385
  46. Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Wilder AD, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:1117–1123
  47. Van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater. 2000;16:285–291
  48. Tyas MJ. Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results. Aust Dent J. 1996;41:324–327
  49. Türkün SL. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent. 2003;31:527–534
  50. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Two-year clinical evaluation of two dentine-adhesive systems in cervical lesions. J Dent. 1993;21:195–202
  51. Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Wilson NH. A three-year evaluation of restorations placed with a smear-layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:333–341
  52. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC, Ritter AV. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results. Oper Dent. 2003;28:482–487
  53. Hennig AC, Helbig EB, Haufe E, Richter G, Klimm HW. Die Versorgung von Klasse-V-Kavitäten mit dem Ormocer-basierenden Füllungssystem Admira. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2004;114:104–114
  54. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive. Am J Dent. 2003;16:363–368
  55. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions. Oper Dent. 2000;25:46–50
  56. Merte K, Frohlich M, Hafer M, Hirsch E, Schneider H, Winkler M. Two-year clinical performance of two primer adhesives on Class V restorations. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:93–99
  57. Brackett WW, Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estudillo H. Eighteen-month clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared Class V resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2005;30:424–429
  58. Hörsted-Bindslev P, Knudsen J, Baelum V. 3-Year clinical evaluation of modified Gluma adhesive systems in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions. Am J Dent. 1996;9:22–26
  59. Blunck U. Klinische Prüfung von AdheSE und Excite zur Versorgung von Zahnhalsdefekten - Ergebnisse nach 18 und 36 Monaten; Bericht an Ivoclar Vivadent 2006.
  60. Mandras RS, Thurmond JW, Latta MA, Matranga LF, Kildee JM, Barkmeier WW. Three-year clinical evaluation of the Clearfil Liner Bond system. Oper Dent. 1997;22:266–270
  61. Smith CD, Dickinson GL, Morris CF, Cliett BA. Two-year clinical evaluation of non-retentive Class V restorations. J Dent Res 2000;75(Spec Issue A):Abstract No. 3031, 396.
  62. Sturdevant J, Bayne S, Heymann H, Wilder A, Roberson TM. 3-Year clinical evaluation of LC resin-modified glass ionomer restoration. J Dent Res 2000;75(Spec Issue A):Abstract No. 1223, 170.
  63. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Brackett MG. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent. 2001;26:12–16
  64. Friedl KH, Hiller K-A, Jung H, Schlittenbauer T, Lichtblau J, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of composite restorations using different adhesive systems 2004;83(Spec Issue A):Abstract No. 535 (www.dentalresearch.org).
  65. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study. Oper Dent. 2000;25:251–258
  66. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW, Triolo PT, Cavel WT. Three-year clinical evaluation of the Clearfil Liner Bond 2 System. J Dent Res 2000;75(Spec Issue A):Abstract No. 1030, 272.
  67. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW, Shaddy RS, Cavel WT, Blankenau RJ. Clinical evaluation of the Prime and Bond 2.1 adhesive system. J Dent Res 2000;75(Spec Issue A):Abstract No. 1027, 272.
  68. Pollington S, van Noort R. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up. Am J Dent. 2008;21:49–52
  69. Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA, Estrada BE. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2003;28:477–481
  70. Ermis RB. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:542–548
  71. Schwartz RS, Haveman CW, Conn LJ, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. Clinical evaluation of a one bottle adhesive: 18 month results. J Dent Res 2000;75(Spec Issue A):Abstract No. 1534.
  72. Papathanasiou A, Kugel G, Kastali S. Clinical evaluation of a new adhesive-composite system. J Dent Res 2004;84(Spec Issue A):Abstract No. 0538 (www.dentalresearch.org).
  73. Abdalla AI, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical performance of a self-etch adhesive in Class V restorations made with and without acid etching. J Dent. 2007;35:558–563
  74. Özgünaltay G, Önen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious Class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:1037–1041
  75. Matis BA, Cochran MJ, Carlson TJ, Guba C, Eckert GJ. A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:451–457

PII: S0109-5641(08)00275-3

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.004

Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 5 , Pages 605-620 , May 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution