Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 500-505 , April 2009

Surface roughness of impression materials and dental stones scanned by non-contacting laser profilometry

Received 26 February 2008 ,Accepted 14 October 2008.

References 

  1. Gregg T, Mace S, West NX, Addy M. A study in vitro of the abrasive effect of the tongue on enamel and dentine softened by acid erosion. Caries Res. 2004;38:557–560
  2. Attin T, Zirkel C, Hellwig E. Brushing abrasion of eroded dentin after application of sodium fluoride solutions. Caries Res. 1998;32:344–350
  3. Ganss C, Schlueter N, Friedrich D, Klimek J. Efficacy of waiting periods and topical fluoride treatment on toothbrush abrasion of eroded enamel in situ. Caries Res. 2007;41:146–151
  4. Attin T, Siegel S, Buchalla W, Lennon AM, Hannig C, Becker K. Brushing abrasion of softened and remineralised dentin: an in situ study. Caries Res. 2004;38:62–66
  5. Bartlett DW, Blunt L, Smith BGN. Measurement of tooth wear in patients with palatal erosion. Br Dent J. 1997;182:179–184
  6. Pintado MR, Anderson GC, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:313–320
  7. Peters MC, DeLong R, Pintado MR, Pallesen U, Qvist V, Douglas WH. Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear. J Dent. 1999;27:479–485
  8. Azzopardi A, Bartlett DW, Watson TF, Sherriff M. The measurement and prevention of erosion and abrasion. J Dent. 2001;29:395–400
  9. Mehl A, Glogger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res. 1997;76:1799–1807
  10. Schlueter N, Ganss C, De Sanctis S, Klimek J. Evaluation of a profilometrical method for monitoring erosive tooth wear. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:505–511
  11. Chadwick RG, Mitchell HL. Conduct of an algorithm in quantifying simulated palatal surface tooth erosion. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:450–456
  12. Eisenburger M, Shellis RP, Addy M. Comparative study of wear of enamel induced by alternating and simultaneous combinations of abrasion and erosion in vitro. Caries Res. 2003;37:450–455
  13. Wetton S, Hughes J, West N, Addy M. Exposure time of enamel and dentine to saliva for protection against erosion: a study in vitro. Caries Res. 2006;40:213–217
  14. Chadwick RG, Mitchell HL, Cameron I, Hunter B, Tulley M. Development of a novel system for assessing tooth and restorations wear. J Dent. 1997;25:41–47
  15. McBride JW, Maul C. The 3D measurement and analysis of high precision surfaces using con-focal optical methods. IEICE Trans Electron. 2004;E87-C:1261–1267
  16. Wieland M, Textor M, Spencer ND, Brunette DM. Wavelength-dependent roughness: a quantitative approach to characterizing the topography of rough titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:163–181
  17. DeLong R, Pintado MR, Ko CC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosth. 2001;10:78–85
  18. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Rousson V. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater. 2006;22:146–165
  19. Shah S, Sundaram G, Bartlett D, Sherriff M. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques. J Dent. 2004;32:653–658

PII: S0109-5641(08)00253-4

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.003

Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 500-505 , April 2009

Article Tools