Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 494-499 , April 2009

In vitro evaluation of a mechanical testing chewing simulator

Received 28 April 2008 ,Accepted 26 September 2008.

References 

  1. Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater. 2006;22:712–734
  2. De Boever JA, et al. Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40:326–333
  3. Eichner K. Messung der Kräfte bei Kauvorgängen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 1963;18:915–924
  4. Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function—a review of the literature. III. Masticatory performance and efficiency. J Oral Rehabil. 1976;3:57–67
  5. Kohyama K, et al. Effects of sample hardness on human chewing force: a model study using silicone rubber. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49:805–816
  6. Schindler HJ, Stengel E, Spiess WE. Feedback control during mastication of solid food textures—a clinical-experimental study. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:330–336
  7. DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res. 1983;62:32–36
  8. Fontijn-Tekamp FA, et al. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1519–1524
  9. Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: a methodologic clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:20–27
  10. Waltimo A, Könönen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy adults. Scand J Dent Res. 1993;101:171–175
  11. Baltzer A, Kaufmann-Jinoian V. Die Beurteilung von Kaukräften. Quintessenz Zahntechnik. 2002;28:928–998
  12. Körber KH, Ludwig K. Maximale Kaukraft als Berechnungsfaktor zahntechnischer Konstruktionen. Dent Labor. 1983;31:55–60
  13. DeLong R, et al. The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth. A clinical correlation. Dent Mater. 1985;1:238–242
  14. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 3. Korrelation mit In-vivo-Resultaten. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100:1445–1449
  15. Sakaguchi RL, et al. The wear of a posterior dental composite in an artificial mouth. A clinical correlation. Dent Mater. 1986;2:235–240
  16. Kern M, Strub JR, Lü X-Y. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:372–378
  17. Gu X-H, Kern M. Marginal discrepancies and leakage of all-ceramic crowns: influence of luting agents and aging conditions. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:109–116
  18. Heintze SD, Zappini G, Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators—results of a round robin test. Dent Mater. 2005;21:304–317
  19. Heintze SD, et al. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods. Dent Mater. 2006;22:166–175
  20. Steinebrunner L, et al. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant–abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:875–881
  21. Koutayas SO, et al. Influence of design and mode of loading on the fracture strength of all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. An in-vitro study in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:540–547
  22. Heydecke G, et al. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:438–445
  23. Stober T, et al. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact. Dent Mater. 2006;22:243–249
  24. Meschede D. rev. ed.. Gerthsen Physik. vol. 23. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006;p. 1162
  25. Dresig H, Holzweißig F. rev. ed.. Maschinendynamik. vol. 7. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006;p. 526

PII: S0109-5641(08)00252-2

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.010

Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 494-499 , April 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution