Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 12 , Pages 1594-1601, December 2008

Slumping during sculpturing of composite materials

  • Yu-Chih Chiang

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry and Graduate Institute of Clinical Dentistry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    • Department of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Dental School of the Ludwig-Maximilians University, Goethestr. 70, D-80336 Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Alena Knezevic

      Affiliations

    • Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia
  • ,
  • Karl-Heinz Kunzelmann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Dental School of the Ludwig-Maximilians University, Goethestr. 70, D-80336 Munich, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: +49 89 51609346; fax: +49 89 51609302.

Received 26 February 2008; received in revised form 15 April 2008; accepted 18 August 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

This study investigated the slumping characteristics of four composite materials during sculpturing prior to their polymerization.

Methods

Four different composite materials were used to measure shape deformation due to slumping. Silicon impressions of the occlusal plane of three different molars were used as a mould for the composite samples. The surface of the samples was digitized with a laser scanner (400 slices, lateral resolution: 25μm). Scans were made after 1–4min. The 3D data sets were numerically superimposed with matching software and differences were calculated relative to the baseline measurement.

Results

The amount of surface deformation increases with increasing observation time. The average coefficient of variation was 0.2. The largest mean amount of slumping was observed for ELS with tooth mould 1 (150.0μm), and for Clearfil Majesty with tooth mould 2 (98.3μm) and mould 3 (42.8μm). Miris 2 Dentin and Synergy D6 Enamel were rather similar and seem to exhibit little deformation. The slump flow of ELS and Clearfil Majesty was up to 400% higher than the formers. The deformation could be sorted in the following order “mould 3”<“mould 2”<“mould 1” for all materials and all observation time. There was a significant influence (p<0.05) of the three factors, time, mould and composite type (ANOVA).

Significance

This specific method provides a reproducible approach for the assessment of the handling characteristics of composite materials. The results can identify slumping differences and assist in collecting information about the feasibility of a material for certain indications.

Keywords: Composite materials, Handling characteristics, Slumping, Sculpturing, Rheologic property

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(08)00220-0

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.08.008

Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 12 , Pages 1594-1601, December 2008