Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 326-330 , March 2009

Impact of thermal properties of veneering ceramics on the fracture load of layered Ce-TZP/A nanocomposite frameworks

Received 27 March 2008 ,Revised 6 August 2008 ,Accepted 7 August 2008.

References 

  1. Tsukuma K, Shimada M. Strength, fracture toughness and Vickers hardness of CeO2-stabilized tetragonal ZrO2 polycrystals (Ce-TZP). J Mater Sci. 1985;20:1178–1184
  2. Nawa M, Nakamoto S, Sekino T, Niihara K. Tough and strong Ce-TZP/alumina nanocomposites doped with titania. Ceram Int. 1998;24:497–506
  3. Fischer J, Stawarczyk B. Compatibility of machined Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and a veneering ceramic. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1500–1505
  4. Bagby M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. Metal–ceramic compatibility: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:21–25
  5. DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ. Viscoelastic stress analysis of thermally compatible and incompatible metal–ceramic systems. Dent Mater. 1998;14:237–245
  6. Coffey JP, Anusavice KJ, DeHoff PH, Lee RB, Hojjatie B. Influence of contraction mismatch and cooling rate on flexural failure of PFM systems. J Dent Res. 1988;67:61–65
  7. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21:984–991
  8. Vult Von Steyern PV, Carlson P, Nilner K. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zircon technique. A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:180–187
  9. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Lüthy H, Gauckler LJ, Schärer P, et al. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int. 2006;37:41–49
  10. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CHF. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:383–388
  11. Hämmerle CHF. Success and failure of fixed bridge-work. Periodontology 2000. 1994;4:41–51
  12. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CHF. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal–ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: single crowns. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2007;18:73–85
  13. Annusavice KJ, Kakar K, Ferree N. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses?. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2007;18(Suppl. 3):218–231
  14. Voss R. Stability of metal–ceramic crowns [Die Festigkeit metallkeramischer Kronen]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 1969;24:726–731
  15. Strub JR, Beschnidt SM. Fracture strength of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:602–609
  16. Helkimo E, Carlson GE, Helkimo M. Bite force and state dentition. Acta Odont Scand. 1976;35:297–303
  17. Kellerhoff RK, Fischer J. In vitro fracture strength and thermal shock resistance of metal–ceramic crowns with cast and machined AuTi frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:209–215
  18. Gardner FM, Tillman-McCombs KW, Gaston ML, Runyan DA. In vitro failure load of metal-collar margins compared with porcelain facial margins of metal–ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:1–4
  19. Ku CW, Park SW, Yang HS. Comparison of the fracture strengths of metal–ceramic crowns and three ceromer crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:170–175

PII: S0109-5641(08)00212-1

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.08.001

Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 326-330 , March 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution