Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 48-57 , January 2009

An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment

  • Amr S. Fawzy

      Affiliations

    • Dental Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, 25 Soliman Pasha EL-Sayyid Street, Heliopolis, Cairo 11351, Egypt
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +202 26359765; fax: +202 26382906.
  • ,
  • Mohammed A. Amer

      Affiliations

    • Engineering and Surface Metrology Department, NIS, Cairo, Egypt

Received 10 June 2007 ,Revised 10 May 2008 ,Accepted 13 May 2008.

References 

  1. Ogawa T, Ozawa S, Shih JH, Ryu KH, Sukotjo C, Yang JM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rates. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1857–1863
  2. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxiand T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;45:75–83
  3. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andresson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials. 1996;17:15–22
  4. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:211–222
  5. Bruni S, Martinesi M, Stio M, Treves C, Bacci T, Borgioli F. Effects of surface treatment of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy on biocompatibility in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:223–234
  6. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lausmaa J. Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of cp titanium screws blasted with 25- and 75-microns-sized particles of AL2O3. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;30:251–260
  7. Pypen CMJM, Plenk H, Ebel ME, Svagera R, Wemisch J. Characterization of micro-blasted and reactive ion etched surfaces on the commercially pure metals niobium, tantalum and titanium. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1997;8:781–784
  8. Hacking SA, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. The osseous response to corundum blasted implant surfaces in a canine hip model. Clin Orthop. 1999;364:240–253
  9. Sittig C, Textor M, Spencer ND, Wieland M, Vallotton PH. Surface characterization of implant materials c.p. Ti, Ti-6AL-7Nb and Ti-6AL-4V with different pretreatments. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1999;10:35–46
  10. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Rodahl M, Kasemo B, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. Biomaterials. 1994;15:1062–1074
  11. Lchikawa T, Hanawa T, Ukai H. Murakami K: three-dimensional bone response to commercially pure titanium, hydroxyapatite, and calcium-ion-mixing titanium in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:231–238
  12. Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;32:409–417
  13. Vanzillotta P, Sader M, Bastos I, Soares G. Improvement of in vitro titanium bioactivity by three different surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2006;22:275–282
  14. Hench LL. Bioactive ceramics: theory and clinical applications. In:  Andersson OH,  Yli-Urpo A editor. Bioceramics 7. Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann, Ltd.; 1994;p. 3–14
  15. Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosth Dent. 2000;84:522–534
  16. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Ultrastructure of the bone-titanium interface in rabbits. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1992;3:262–271
  17. Steflif DE, Sisk AL, Parr GR, Gardner LK, Hanes PJ, Lake FT, et al. Osteogenesis at the dental implant interface: high-voltage electron microscopic and conventional transmission electron microscopic observation. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:791–800
  18. Klein CPAT, Wolke JGC, deGroot K. Stability of calcium phosphate ceramics and plasma sprayed coating. In:  Hench LL,  Wilson J editor. An Introduction to Bioceramics. Singapore: World science; 1993;p. 199–222
  19. Zhao X, Liu X, Ding C, Chu PK. In vitro bioactivity of plasma-sprayed TiO2 coating after sodium hydroxide treatment. Surf Coat Technol. 2006;200:5487–5492
  20. Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Effect of heat treatment on apatite-forming ability of Ti metal induced by alkali treatment. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1997;8:341–347
  21. Nishiguchi S, Kato H, Fujita H, Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, et al. Enhancement of bone-bonding strengths of titanium alloy implants by alkali and heat treatments. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;48:689–696
  22. Uchida M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T. Effect of water treatment on the apatite-forming ability of NaOH-treated titanium metal. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:522–530
  23. Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T, Nishiguchi S, Tamura J, Uchida M, Kim HM, et al. Bioactive titanium: effect of sodium removal on the bone-bonding ability of bioactive titanium prepared by alkali and heat treatment. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;56:562–570
  24. Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Suzuki J, Matsushita T, Kokubo T, et al. Osteoinductive porous titanium implants: effect of sodium removal by dilute HCl treatment. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2682–2691
  25. Stout KJ, Sullivan PJ, Dong WP, Mainsah E, Luo N, Mathia T, Zahouani H. The development of methods for the characterization of roughness on three dimensions. Publication No. EUR 15178 EN of the Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1994.
  26. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andresson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:38–45
  27. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:331–344
  28. Wieland M, Textor M, Spencer ND, Brunette DM. Wavelength-dependent roughness: a quantitative approach to characterizing the topography of rough titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:163–181
  29. Wieland M, Hanggi P, Hotz W, Textor M, Keller BA, Spencer ND. Wavelength-dependent measurement and evaluation of surface topographies: application of a new concept of window roughness and surface transfer function. Wear. 2000;237:231–252
  30. Chehroudi B, Me Donnel D, Brunette DM. The effects of micromachined surfaces on formation of bone like tissue on subcutaneous implants as assessed by radiography and computer image processing. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;34:279–290
  31. Wilkinson CDW, Curtis ASG, Crossan J. Nanofabrication in cellular engineering. J Vac Sci Technol. 1998;B16:3132–3136
  32. Arvidsson A, Sater BA, Wennerberg A. The role of functional parameters for topographical characterization of bone-anchored implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(2):70–76
  33. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Biomaterial and implant surfaces: the role of cleanliness, contamination and preparation procedures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1988;22:145–153
  34. Placko HE, Mishra S, Weimer JJ, Lucas LC. Surface characterization of titanium based implant materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:355–363
  35. Kilpadi DV, Lemons JE, Liu J, Raikar GN, Weimer JJ, Vohra Y. Cleaning and heat treatment effects on unalloyed titanium implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:219–230
  36. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. A comparative study between in vivo bone in growth and in vitro apatite formation on Na2O–CaO–SiO2 glasses. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1349–1356
  37. Nishiguchi S, Kato H, Neo M, Oka M, Kim HM, Kokube T, et al. Alkali- and heat-treated porous titanium for orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;54:198–208
  38. Yan WQ, Nakamura T, Kobayashi M, Kim HM, Kokubo T. Bonding of chemically treated titanium implants to bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;37:267–275

PII: S0109-5641(08)00138-3

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.007

Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 48-57 , January 2009