Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 4-12, January 2009

Influence of joint component mechanical properties and adhesive layer thickness on stress distribution in micro-tensile bond strength specimens

  • Aline de A. Neves

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Belgium
  • ,
  • Eduardo Coutinho

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Belgium
  • ,
  • André Poitevin

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Belgium
  • ,
  • Jos Van der Sloten

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, Belgium
  • ,
  • Bart Van Meerbeek

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Leuven BIOMAT Research Cluster, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Tel.: +32 16 337587; fax: +32 16 332752.
  • ,
  • Hans Van Oosterwyck

      Affiliations

    • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Division of Biomechanics and Engineering Design, Belgium

Received 15 October 2007; received in revised form 20 March 2008; accepted 15 April 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

Differences in mechanical properties between adherents and adhesive result in stress singularity at the free edge for tensile test specimens. Beyond causing premature failures, these also trigger fracture initiation at the bond edge, where the use of the maximum stress at failure as a measure of strength is not a reliable parameter for obtaining bond strength. The aim of this study is to describe the pattern of stress concentration along the interface for micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) specimens. Also, possible sources of variation in stress concentration (adhesive layer thickness and mechanical properties) were evaluated using the finite element method.

Methods

One-fourth models of typical μTBS specimens were created using axisymmetric elements. A 15MPa load was applied at the outer edge and finite element calculations were performed within the elastic deformation range. In the first set of runs, the adhesive thickness was varied and in the second set, different ν/E ratios between the adhesive and the adherent were assigned.

Results

When adhesive thickness increased, a significant increase in stress concentration at the free edge and in the length of the stress-affected area was observed. Increasing the ν/E ratio between adhesive and adherent lead to an increase in stress concentration at the free edge area without change in length of the stress-affected area.

Significance

If mechanical properties and adhesive thickness expected for a specific composite–dentin bond combination in μTBS specimens are known, stress concentration at the interface can be predicted. The adhesive thickness should remain constant when comparing different joints, as it facilitates the interpretation of nominal strength values.

Keywords: Micro-tensile bond strength test, Composite–dentin interface, Micro-specimens, Stress concentration, Adhesive bond, Stress singularity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(08)00119-X

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.009

Dental Materials
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 4-12, January 2009