Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 12 , Pages 1655-1660 , December 2008

Sulcus reproduction with elastomeric impression materials: A new in vitro testing method

  • Werner J. Finger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Preclinical Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 32, 50931 Cologne, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 2133 514996; fax: +49 2133 513410.
  • ,
  • Rie Kurokawa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Niigata University, Japan
  • ,
  • Hidekazu Takahashi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials, Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Masashi Komatsu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

Received 2 August 2007 ,Revised 10 March 2008 ,Accepted 27 March 2008.

References 

  1. Qualtrough AJE, Piddok V. Fitting accuracy of indirect restorations: a review of methods of assessment. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1992;1:57–61
  2. Dedmon HW. Disparity in expert opinions on size of acceptable margin openings. Oper Dent. 1982;7:97–101
  3. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979;87:369–377
  4. De Backer H, van Maele G, de Moor N, van den Berghe L. Survival of complete crowns and periodontal health: 18-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:151–158
  5. Page L, Ginsberg Halpern B. Restorative dentistry. Interactions with periodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1993;37:457–463
  6. Shah S, Sundaram G, Bartlett D, Sherriff M. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques. J Dent. 2004;32:653–658
  7. Chen SY, Liang WM, Chen FN. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. J Dent. 2004;32:603–609
  8. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials. Scand J Dent Res. 1989;97:375–379
  9. Endo T, Finger WJ. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material. Quintessence Int. 2006;37:47–51
  10. Endo T, Finger WJ. Evaluation of the elastic recovery of polyether impression materials. Am J Dent. 2005;18:355–360
  11. Baharav H, Kupershmidt I, Laufer B-Z, Cardash HS. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut. J Prosthodont. 2004;17:585–589
  12. Aimijrakul P, Masuda T, Takahashi H, Miura H. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:385–389
  13. Laufer BZ, Baharav H, Ganor Y, Cardash HS. The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:466–471
  14. Laufer BZ, Baharav H, Langer Y, Cardash HS. The closure of the gingival crevice following gingival retraction for impression making. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:629–635
  15. Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Komatsu M. Surface detail reproduction with new elastomeric dental impression materials. Quintessence Int. 2007;38:479–488
  16. Takahashi H, Finger WJ. Dentin surface reproduction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic impression materials. Dent Mater. 1991;7:197–201
  17. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Impression materials: effect of hydrophilicity and viscosity on ability to displace water from dentin surfaces. Scand J Dent Res. 1988;96:253–259
  18. McCabe JF, Carrick DE. Recording surface detail on moist surfaces with elastomeric impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2006;14:42–46
  19. Johnson GH, Craig RG. Accuracy of addition silicones as a function of technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:197–203
  20. International Organization for Standardization . ISO Standard 4823. Dentistry—elastomeric impression materials. 3rd ed.. December 15, 2000;

PII: S0109-5641(08)00096-1

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.025

Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 12 , Pages 1655-1660 , December 2008