Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 10 , Pages 1304-1310, October 2008

Polymerization contraction stress in dentin adhesives bonded to dentin and enamel

  • Masanori Hashimoto

      Affiliations

    • Division of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, School of Dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, 1757 Kanazawa, Ishikari-Tobetsu, Hokkaido 061-0293, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81 133 23 1211; fax: +81 133 23 1669.
  • ,
  • Anton J. de Gee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry at Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Albert J. Feilzer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry at Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 11 November 2007; accepted 13 February 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

In a previous study on of polymerization contraction stress determinations of adhesives bonded to dentin a continuous decline of stress was observed after the adhesives had been light-cured. The decline was ascribed to stress relief caused by diffusion into the adhesive layer of water and/or solvents, left in the impregnated dentin surface after drying and/or evaporation in the application procedure. The purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the contraction stress of adhesives bonded to enamel will not decline after light-curing, based on the assumption that water and/or solvents are more efficiently removed from impregnated enamel surfaces in the drying and/or evaporation step.

Materials and methods

Contraction stress was determined in a tensilometer for three total-etching adhesives Scotchbond multi-purpose, Single bond and One-step plus and four self-etching adhesives Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, AdheSE, and Xeno III. The adhesives were placed in a thin layer between a glass plate and a flat dentin or enamel surface pre-treated with phosphoric acid or self-etching primer and light-cured under constrained conditions.

Results

All adhesives bonded to enamel showed a stress decline, but significantly less than for dentin with the exception of two self-etching adhesives. The greatest decline was found for the total-etching adhesive systems bonded to dentin. The presence of hydrophobic monomers in the adhesives had a significant influence on the decline.

Significance

The experiments indicate that fluids are withdrawn from the resin impregnated tooth structures, which may result in small defects in the tooth–resin interfaces.

Keywords: Polymerization, Polymerization contraction stress, Resin adhesive, Enamel, Dentin

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(08)00045-6

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.008

Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 10 , Pages 1304-1310, October 2008