Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 9 , Pages 1201-1206 , September 2008

Cytotoxicity of silica–glass fiber reinforced composites

  • Gökçe Meriç

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
    • NIOM, Nordic Institute of Dental Materials, Haslum, Norway
    • ,
  • Jon E. Dahl

      Affiliations

    • NIOM, Nordic Institute of Dental Materials, Haslum, Norway
    • ,
  • I. Eystein Ruyter

      Affiliations

    • NIOM, Nordic Institute of Dental Materials, Haslum, Norway
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: NIOM, Nordic Institute of Dental Materials, P.O. Box 70, NO-1305, Haslum, Norway. Tel.: +47 67 51 22 09; fax: +47 67 59 15 30.

Received 25 June 2007 ,Revised 23 January 2008 ,Accepted 29 January 2008.

References 

  1. Vallittu PK, Ruyter IE, Ekstrand K. Effect of water storage on the flexural properties of E-glass and silica fiber acrylic resin composite. Int J Posthodont. 1998;11:340–350
  2. Vallittu PK, Ekstrand K. In vitro cytotoxicity of fibre-polymethyl methacrylate composite used in dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:666–671
  3. Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Transverse strength and fatigue of denture acrylic–glass fiber composite. Dent Mater. 1994;10:116–121
  4. Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fujii K, Ban S. Impact strength of acrylic denture base resin reinforced with woven glass fiber. Dent Mater J. 2003;22:30–38
  5. Pantano CG, Carman LA, Warner S. Glass fiber surface effects in silane coupling. In:  Mittal KL editors. Silanes and Other Coupling Agents. Utrecht: VSP; 1992;p. 229–240
  6. Meriç G, Dahl JE, Ruyter IE. Physicochemical evaluation of silica–glass fiber reinforced polymers for prosthodontic applications. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:258–264
  7. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:431–437
  8. Meriç G, Ruyter IE. Effect of thermal cycling on composites reinforced with two differently sized silica-glass fibers. Dent Mater 2006 Nov 20 [Epub ahead of print].
  9. Huang FM, Tai KW, Hu CC, Chang YC. Cytotoxic effects of denture base materials on a permanent human oral epithelial cell line and on primary human oral fibroblasts in vitro. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:439–443
  10. Kaaber S, Thulin H, Nielsen E. Skin sensitivity to denture base materials in the burning mouth syndrome. Contact Dermat. 1979;5:90–96
  11. Sadamori S, Shigeto N, Hamada T, Okuda K. A method of determining residual monomer in acrylic resin using methyl ethyl ketone. Aust Dent J. 1990;35:509–513
  12. Austin AT, Basker RM. The level of residual monomer in acrylic denture base materials with particular reference to a modified method of analysis. Br Dent J. 1980;149:281–286
  13. Barclay SC, Forsyth A, Felix DH, Watson IB. Case report-hypersensitivity to denture materials. Br Dent J. 1999;187:350–352
  14. Ruyter IE, Øysaed H. Conversion in denture base polymers. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16:741–754
  15. Ruyter IE. Release of formaldehyde from denture base polymers. Acta Odontol Scand. 1980;38:17–27
  16. In:  O’Brien WJ editors. Dental materials: properties and selection. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 2002;p. 12–23
  17. Kedjarune U, Charoenworaluk N, Koontongkaew S. Release of methyl methacrylate from heat-cured and autopolymerized resins: Cytotoxicity testing related to residual monomer. Aust Dent J. 1999;44:25–30
  18. Tunçel A, Ozdemir AK, Sümer Z, Hürmüzlü F, Polat Z. Cytotoxicity evaluation of two different composites with/without fibers and one nanohybrid composite. Dent Mater J. 2006;25:267–271
  19. In:  O’Brien WJ editors. Dental materials: properties and selection. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 2002;p. 391–392
  20. Vajrabhaya L, Sithisarn P. Multilayer and monolayer cell cultures in a cytotoxicity assay of root canal sealers. Int Endod J. 1997;30:141–144
  21. Segerström S, Meriç G, Knarvang T, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of two matrix materials intended for fiber-reinforced polymers. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:422–428
  22. Quartzel fiber products-brochure and technical data. Paris: Saint-Gobain Quartz; 2004. p. 1–24.
  23. ISO 6344-1. Coated abrasives—grain size analysis. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1998. p. 1–6.
  24. ISO 1567. Dentistry—denture base polymers. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1999. p. 1–27.
  25. ISO 10477. Dentistry—polymer-based crown and bridge materials. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2004. p. 1–21.
  26. ISO 7405. Dentistry – preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry – Test methods for dental materials. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1997. p. 1–19.
  27. Edmondson JM, Armstrong LS, Martinez AO. A rapid and simple MTT-based spectrophotometric assay for determining drug sensitivity in monolayer cultures. J Tissue Culture Methods. 1988;11:15–17
  28. Sjögren G, Sletten G, Dahl JE. Cytotoxicity of dental alloys, metals, and ceramics assessed by millipore filter, agar overlay, and MTT tests. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:229–236
  29. Dahl JE, Frangou-Polyzois MJ, Polyzois GL. In vitro biocompatibility of denture relining materials. Gerodontology. 2006;23:17–22
  30. Wataha JC, Lockwood PE, Nelson SK, Rakich D. In vitro cytotoxicity of dental casting alloys over 8 months. J Oral Rehab. 1999;26:379–387
  31. Lönnroth EC, Dahl JE. Cytotoxicity of liquids and powders of chemically different dental materials evaluated using dimethylthiazol diphenyltetrazolium and neutral red tests. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003;61:52–56
  32. Jorge JH, Giampaolo ET, Machado AL, Vergani CE. Cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:190–193
  33. Miettinen VM, Vallittu PK. Release of residual methyl methacrylate into water from glass fibre poly(methyl methacrylate) composite used in dentures. Biomaterials. 1997;18:181–185
  34. Sipahi C, Ozen J, Ural AU, Dalkiz M, Beydemir B. The effect of two fibre impregnation methods on the cytotoxicity of a glass and carbon fibre-reinforced acrylic resin denture base material on oral epithelial cells and fibroblasts. J Oral Rehab. 2006;33:666–673
  35. Ekstrand K, Ruyter IE, Wellendorf H. Carbon/graphite fiber reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate): properties under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;21:1065–1080
  36. Vallittu PK, Ruyter IE, Buykuilmaz S. Effect of polymerization temperature and time on the residual monomer content of denture base polymers. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:588–593
  37. Bayraktar G, Duran O, Guvener B. Effect of glass fibre reinforcement on residual methyl methacrylate content of denture base polymers. J Dent. 2003;31:297–302
  38. Sheridan PJ, Koka S, Ewoldsen NO, Lefebvre CA, Lavin MT. Cytotoxicity of denture base resins. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10:73–77

PII: S0109-5641(08)00024-9

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.010

Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 9 , Pages 1201-1206 , September 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution