Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 9 , Pages 1187-1193 , September 2008

Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: The therapeutic range of different cement types

Received 15 March 2007 ,Accepted 17 January 2008.

References 

  1. DeBacker H, Van Maele G, DeMoor N, Van den Berghe L, DeBoever J. A 20-year retrospective survival study of fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:143–153
  2. Ödmann P, Andersson B. Procera AllCeram crowns followed for 5 to 10.5 years. A prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:504–509
  3. Jokstad A. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of single crowns retained with resin-modified glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate luting cements. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:411–416
  4. Pospiech P. All-ceramic crowns: bonding or cementing?. Clin Oral Invest. 2002;6:189–197
  5. Holm C, Tidehag G, Tillberg A, Molin M. Longevity and quality of FPDs: A retrospective study of restorations 30, 20, and 10 years after insertion. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:283–289
  6. Fleming GJ, Marquis PM, Shortall AC. The influence of clinically induced variability on the distribution of compressive fracture strength of a hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement. Dent Mater. 1999;15:87–97
  7. Charsley EL, Warrinton SB. Thermal analysis-techniques and applications. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 1992;
  8. Craig RG, Powers JM. 11th ed.. Mechanical properties restorative dental materials. Mosby St. Louis; 2002;p. 67–110
  9. De Gee AJ, Pallav P. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. J Dent. 1994;22(Suppl. 1):S21–S27
  10. Höhne G, Hemminger W, Flammersheim HJ. Differential scanning calorimetry. An introduction for practitioners. Berlin: Springer Publishing; 1996;
  11. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Loher H, Handel G. Effect of variations from the recommended powder/liquid ratio on some properties of resin-modified cements. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006;64:214–220
  12. Nomoto R, Komoriyama M, McCabe JF, Hirano S. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2004;20:972–978
  13. Darvell BW. Materials science for dentistry. In:  Darvell BW editors. Resin restorative materials. 7th ed.. Hong Kong: BW Darvell; 2002;p. 116–133(ISBN 962-85391-5-9)
  14. Mitsuhasi A, Hanaoka K, Teranaka T. Fracture toughness of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials: effect of powder/liquid ration and powder particle size reduction on fracture toughness. Dent Mater. 2003;19:747–757
  15. Chun Li Z, White SN. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:597–609
  16. Irie M, Suzuki K. Current luting cements: marginal gap formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2001;17:347–353
  17. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2000;16:129–138
  18. Wilder AD, Boghosioan AA, Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM. Effect of powder/liquid ratio on the clinical and laboratory performance of resin-modified glass-ionomers. J Dent. 1998;26:369–377

PII: S0109-5641(08)00022-5

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.013

Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 9 , Pages 1187-1193 , September 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution