Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 9 , Pages 1156-1163, September 2008

Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on self-adhesive cements bonding to dentin

  • Claudia Mazzitelli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials and Restorative Dentistry, Policlinico “Le Scotte”, University of Siena, Viale Bracci, 53100 Siena, Italy
  • ,
  • Francesca Monticelli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials and Restorative Dentistry, Policlinico “Le Scotte”, University of Siena, Viale Bracci, 53100 Siena, Italy
    • Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
  • ,
  • Raquel Osorio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
  • ,
  • Alessio Casucci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials and Restorative Dentistry, Policlinico “Le Scotte”, University of Siena, Viale Bracci, 53100 Siena, Italy
  • ,
  • Manuel Toledano

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
  • ,
  • Marco Ferrari

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials and Restorative Dentistry, Policlinico “Le Scotte”, University of Siena, Viale Bracci, 53100 Siena, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 0577233131; fax: +39 0577233117.

Received 25 August 2007; received in revised form 30 December 2007; accepted 7 January 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate the bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive luting cements to dentin in the presence of simulated hydrostatic intrapulpal pressure (PP).

Methods

Thirty composite overlays (Aelite All Purpose Body) were luted to deep-coronal dentin surfaces using four self-adhesive resin cements (Rely X Unicem, G-Cem, Multilink Sprint, Bis-Cem) and one total-etch system (Calibra). Half of the specimens resin cements were applied under a PP of 15cm H2O. After storage in a moist condition for 1 month (37°C, 100% relative humidity), specimens were sectioned into microtensile beams (1mm2) and stressed to failure with the microtensile bond strength test (μTBS). Data were statistically analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis ranking (p<0.05) and Mann–Whitney tests (p<0.001). The fracture pattern was evaluated under SEM.

Results

Bond strength of Calibra fell significantly when PP was applied during bonding (p<0.05). Rely X Unicem and Bis-Cem performed better under PP. No significant differences for Multilink Sprint and G-Cem bonded specimens were recorded with or without PP.

Significance

Simulated PP influences the adhesive performance of resinous cements. The predominance of acid–base reactions or radical polymerization may explain the different behavior of self-adhesive cements when changing substrate wetness. The application of constant intrapulpal perfusion should be considered when simulating luting procedures in vitro.

Keywords: Self-adhesive cement, Pulpal pressure, Permeability, Dentinal fluid, Hydrophilic polymers

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(08)00017-1

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.005

Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 9 , Pages 1156-1163, September 2008