Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 915-922 , July 2008

Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions

  • Jan W.V. van Dijken

      Affiliations

    • Department of Odontology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 90 7856034/226; fax: +46 90 770580.
    • ,
  • Ulla Pallesen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cariology and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Received 1 March 2007 ,Accepted 11 November 2007.

References 

  1. van Dijken JWV. Multi-step versus simplified enamel-dentin bonding systems. Réalités Cliniques. 1999;10:199–222
  2. van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent. 1998;26:1–20
  3. van Dijken JWV. Clinical evaluation of four dentin bonding agents in class V abrasion lesions, a four year follow up. Dent Mater. 1994;10:319–324
  4. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21:864–881
  5. Gwinnett AJ, Yu S. Effect of long-term water storage on dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 1996;8:109–111
  6. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, Kanemura N, Morigami M, Tagami J, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999;78:906–911
  7. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin–dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1385–1391
  8. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Lindberg A. Clinical long term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Den Mater. 2006;[E-published ahead of print]
  9. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose?. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:57–67
  10. van Dijken JWV. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller and hybrid composite resin fillings. A six year follow up study. Acta Odont Scand. 1986;44:357–367
  11. Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.; 1956;
  12. Burrow MF, Satoh M, Tagami J. Dentin bond durability after three years using a dentin bonding agent with and without priming. Dent Mater. 1996;12:302–307
  13. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Hosoda H. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. Oper Dent. 1994;19:59–64
  14. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent. 1995;20:18–25
  15. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Chung I, Pashley DH, Campbell JA, Laffoon JE, et al. Resin–dentin interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile dentin bond strength after five-year water storage. Oper Dent. 2004;29:705–711
  16. Hashimoto M, Tay FR, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Yiu C, et al. SEM and TEM analysis of water degradation of human dentinal collagen. J Biomed Mat Res. 2003;66:287–298
  17. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al. Clinical status of ten adhesive systems. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1690–1702
  18. Duke E, Robbins JW, Trevino D. The clinical performance of a new adhesive resin system in Class V and IV restorations. Compen Contin Educ Dent. 1994;15:852–862
  19. Tyas MJ. Clinical performance of two dentin adhesives: 2-year results. J Dent Res. 1995;74:404;[Abstract no 28]
  20. Tyas MJ. Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results. Austr Dent J. 1996;41:324–327
  21. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, VanHerle G. Three year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quint Int. 1996;27:775–784
  22. Trevino DF, Duke ES, Robbins JW, Summitt JB. Clinical evaluation of Scotch Bond Multi-Purpose adhesive system. J Dent Res. 1996;75:397;[Abstract no 3037]
  23. Platt JA, Winkler MM, Matis BA, Moore BK. Correlation of dentin adhesive laboratory & clinical performance at two years. J Dent Res. 1997;76:187;[Abstract no 1368]
  24. Platt JA, Winkler MM, Matis BA, Moore BK. Correlation of dentin adhesive laboratory & clinical performance at three years. J Dent Res. 1998;77:236;[Abstract no 1044]
  25. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Retention of microfilled and hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious class V lesions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Operative Dent. 1999;24:26–30
  26. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin based composite in non-carious class V lesions. Operative Dent. 2000;25:46–50
  27. van Dijken JWV. Clinical effectiveness of 12 adhesive systems in Class V non-retentive lesions. J Dent Res. 2001;80:1272;[Abstract no 41]
  28. Özgünltay G, Önen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehab. 2002;29:1037–1041
  29. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2004;17:451–456
  30. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives. JADA. 2005;136:311–322
  31. Cury CG, Teixeira LC, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a new dentin adhesive. J Dent Res. 1992;71:662;[Abstract no 1172]
  32. Mazer RB, Cury C, Teizeira L, Leinfelder KF. Influence of maleic acid on the retention of abfracted lesion restorations. J Dent Res. 1994;73:275;[Abstract no 1389]
  33. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems. Int Dent J. 1996;46:10–14
  34. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann K-H, Hickel R. Tooth-colored filling materials fort he restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study. Operative Dent. 2000;25:251–258
  35. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Wilder AD, Sturdevant JR, Robertson TM, Sluder TB, et al. Clinical performance of bonding systems with and without hybrid layers. J Dent Res. 1996;75:23;[Abstract no 47]
  36. Boghosian A. Clinical evaluation of a filled adhesive system in class V restorations. Compen Contin Educ Dent. 1996;17:750–757
  37. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lemaire V, Mortier M, Lambrechts P, VanHerle G. One-year clinical effectiveness of two total-etch dentin adhesive systems in cervical lesions. J Dent Res. 2001;80:1203;[Abstract no 17]
  38. Boghosian A, Drummond JL, Lautenschlager E. Clinical evaluation of a dentin adhesive system. In: IADR meeting. New Orleans. 2007;[Abstract no 228]
  39. Dickinson GL, Smith CD, Morris C. Clinical evaluation of Permagen universal bonding system with Amelogen composite. J Dent Res. 1996;75:397;[Abstract no 3035]
  40. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Gingell JC. Barnes CA. A 24 month clinical evaluation of dyract light cured compomer restorative. J Dent Res. 1997;76:165;[Abstract no 1213]
  41. Elderton RJ, Vowles RW, Bell CJ, Marshall KJ. Three year retention of cervical compomer restorations in non-undercut cavities. J Dent Res. 1997;76:162;[Abstract no 1185]
  42. Loher C, Kunzelman KH, Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements (LC), compolymer and composite restorations in Class V cavities. Two-year results. J Dent Res. 1997;162;[Abstract no 1190]
  43. Schuster S, Schreger E, Klimm W, Koch R. Klinische untersuchungen von klasse-V-kompomerfüllungen. Deutsche Zahnärztl Zeit. 1997;52:828–832
  44. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). J Dent Res. 1997;76:165;[Abstract no 1212]
  45. Merte K, Hirsch E, Häfer M, Fröhlich M. Quality testing of acetone-based primers—a clinical evaluation. J Dent Res. 1977;76:162;[Abstract no 1187]
  46. Wicht MJ, Fritz UB, Noack MJ. A one-year follow-up of Class V restorations. J Dent Res. 1997;76:165;[Abstract no 1210]
  47. Abdalla AL, Alhadainy HA. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restorations in Class V abrasion lesios. Two-years results. Quintessence Int. 1997;28:255–258
  48. Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N, Fletcher JM. A three year clinical evaluation of a compomer restorative. J Dent Res. 1997;76:162;[Abstract no 1189]
  49. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Operative Dent. 1998;23:77–80
  50. Klimm W, Schuster S, Schreger E, Koch R. Clinical evaluation of class V restorations using 3 compomers. J Dent Res. 1998;77:954;[Abstract no 2580]
  51. Wicht MJ, Fritz UB, Noack MJ. Influence of enamel etching on Class V Dyract restorations. J Dent Res. 1998;77:189;[Abstract no 672]
  52. Gladys S, van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, VanHerle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glasss-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions. Dent Mater. 1998;14:294–306
  53. Tyas MJ. Three-year cinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract). Operative Dent. 2000;25:152–154
  54. Merte K, Fröhlich M, Häfer M, Hirsch E, Schneider H, Winkler M. Two-year clinical performance of two primer adhesives on class V restorations. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:93–99
  55. Lenarda Rdi, Cadenaro M, Stefano Dorigo Ede. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation. Operative Dent. 2000;25:382–387
  56. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann K-H, Hickel R, Class V. lesions restored with four different tooth-colored material—3-year results. Clin Oral Inv. 2001;5:31–39
  57. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann K-H, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions, 5-year results. Am J Dent. 2001;14:153–156
  58. Gladys S, van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, VanHerle G. Clinical effectiveness of a glass ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical class-V lesions after 3 years. J Dent Res. 2001;78:1205;[Abstract no 33]
  59. Ünlü N, Belli S, Özer F. Clinical evaluation of a compomer resin in Class V abrasion lesions, four year results. J Dent Res. 2002;81:B236;[Abstract no 27]
  60. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5:323–332
  61. Mamenut C, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical ‘abrasion’ lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:739–743
  62. Schwartz RS, Duke ES, Robbins JW, Summitt JB. Clinical evaluation of Vitremer glass ionomer restorative: 1 year results. J Dent Res. 1995;74:404;[Abstract no 27]
  63. Robbins JW, Duke ES, Schwartz RS, Trevino D. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer restorative in cervical abrasions. J Dent Res. 1996;75:39;[Abstract no 171]
  64. Duke E, Robbins JW, Summitt JB, Schwartz RS, Trevino D. Clinical evaluation of Vitremer in cervical abrasions and root caries. J Dent Res. 1998;77:954;[Abstract no 2578]
  65. Gladys S, van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, VanHerle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of hybrid restorative materials in vivo. J Dent Res. 1998;77:1208;[Abstract no 10]
  66. Ermis RB. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:542–548
  67. Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up. J Oral Rehab. 2004;31:251–257
  68. Franco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, Santiago SL, Lauris JRP, Jorge MFF, et al. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus rersin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cercical lesions. Operative Dent. 2006;3:403–408
  69. Brackett WW, Haisch LD, Pearce MG, Brackett MG. Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives. J Prosth Dent. 2004;91:42–45
  70. Perdigao J, Swift RJ, Denehy GE, Wefl JS, Donly KJ. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res. 1994;73:44–55
  71. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Chappell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P. The dentinal surface. Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part III. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:571–582
  72. Chappell RP, Eick JD. Shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopic observation of six current dentinal adhesives. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:359–368
  73. Triolo PT, Swift EJ, Barkmeier WW. Shear bond strength of composite to dentin using six dental adhesive systems. Operative Dent. 1995;20:46–50
  74. Swift EJ, Cloe BC. Shear bond strength of new enamel etchants. Am J Dent. 1993;6:88–90
  75. Beck MD, Swift EJ, Denehy GE. Use of phosphoric acid etchants with Scotchbond Multi-purpose. J Dent Res. 1993;72:133;[Abstract no 240]
  76. Re D, Augusti D, Spreafico , Gagliani M. Effect of oerator variability on dentin adhesion. J Dent Res. 2004;83;[Abstract no 1740]
  77. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidsson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composire restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1240–1243
  78. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidsson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthetic Dent. 1990;64:658–664
  79. van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, Perdigão , Lambrechts P, VanHerle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. In:  Summitt JB,  Robbins JW,  Schwartz RS,  Santos Jdos editor. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. A contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc.; 2001;p. 178–235
  80. Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:1150–1157
  81. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations, A two-year clinical studt. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122:41–47
  82. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system, Results at five years. Operative Dent. 2002;27:438–441
  83. van Dijken JWV. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions, A 6-year follow-up. J Dent. 2005;33:541–547
  84. Latta MA. Physcochemical dentin interactions of 2 etch & rinse adhesives. In: IADR meeting. New Orleans. 2007;[Abstract no 1373]
  85. Fritz V, Finger WJ, Uno S. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements, Bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 1996;12:161–166
  86. van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, VanHerle G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. J Prosth Dent. 1993;70:308–314
  87. Hall LH, Cochran MA, Swrtz ML. Class 5 composite resin restorations: margin configurations and distance from the CEJ. Operative Dent. 1993;18:246–250
  88. Grieve AR, Saunders WP, Alani AH. The effects of dentin bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations—long term studies. J Oral Rehab. 1993;20:11–18

PII: S0109-5641(07)00260-6

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008

Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 915-922 , July 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution