Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 915-922, July 2008

Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions

  • Jan W.V. van Dijken

      Affiliations

    • Department of Odontology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 90 7856034/226; fax: +46 90 770580.
  • ,
  • Ulla Pallesen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cariology and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Received 1 March 2007; accepted 11 November 2007.

Abstract 

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical long-term retention to dentin of seven adhesive systems.

Methods

A total of 270 Class V restorations of four etch-and-rinse, one self-etch adhesive system and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement were placed in non-carious cervical lesions without intentional enamel involvement. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and then every year during a 13-year follow-up. Dentin bonding efficiency was determined by the percentage of lost restorations.

Results

During the 13 years, 215 restorations could be evaluated. The cumulative loss rate at 13 years was 53.0%, with significant different failures rates for the different systems varying between 35.6 and 86.8%. Four systems fulfilled the ADA 18-month full acceptance retention criteria. Two systems showed at 18 months and earlier high debonding rates. The annual failure rates for the etch-and-rinse systems were Optibond 3.1%, Permagen 13.0%, Scotchbond MP 4.8%, Syntac classic 2.8%; for the self-etch system P&S 4.4%; and the resin-modified glass ionomer cement Vitremer 2.7%.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that all systems showed a continuous degradation of the bond with a wide variation, which was independent of the adhesion strategy. Three bonding systems showed a cumulative failure rate after 13 years between 36 and 41% with the best retention for the resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a four-step etch-and-rinse system.

Keywords: Adhesion, Clinical, Dental material, Etch, Glass ionomer, Resin, Restoration, Self-etch

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(07)00260-6

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008

Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 915-922, July 2008