Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 6 , Pages 744-752, June 2008

Thermal compatibility of dental ceramic systems using cylindrical and spherical geometries

  • Paul H. DeHoff

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, Duke Centennial Hall, UNC Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 704 687 8327; fax: +1 704 687 8345.
  • ,
  • Allyson A. Barrett

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Biomaterials, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
  • ,
  • Robert B. Lee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Biomaterials, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
  • ,
  • Kenneth J. Anusavice

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Biomaterials, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

Received 17 March 2007; received in revised form 2 August 2007; accepted 25 August 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

To test the hypothesis that bilayer ceramic cylinders and spheres can provide valid confirmation of thermal incompatibility stresses predicted by finite element analyses.

Methods

A commercial core ceramic and an experimental core ceramic were used to fabricate open-ended cylinders and core ceramic spheres. The core cylinders and spheres were veneered with one of four commercial dental ceramics representing four thermally compatible groups and four thermally incompatible groups. Axisymmetric thermal and viscoelastic elements in the ANSYS finite element program were used to calculate temperatures and stresses for each geometry and ceramic combination. This process required a transient heat transfer analysis for each combination to determine input temperatures for the structural model.

Results

After fabrication, each specimen was examined visually using fiberoptic transillumination for evidence of cracking. There were 100% failures of the thermally incompatible cylinders while none of the thermally compatible combinations failed. Among the spheres, 100% of the thermally incompatible systems failed, 16% of one of the thermally compatible systems failed, and none of the remaining compatible combinations failed. The calculated stress values were in general agreement with the experimental observations, i.e., low residual stresses for the specimens that did not fail and high residual stresses for the specimens that did fail.

Significance

Simple screening geometries can be used to identify highly incompatible ceramic combinations, but they do not identify marginally incompatible systems.

Keywords: Finite elements, Thermal compatibility, Cylinders, Spheres, Viscoelasticity, Thermal contraction, Residual stresses, Dental ceramics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(07)00209-6

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.08.008

Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 6 , Pages 744-752, June 2008