Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 1-8, January 2008

Axial shrinkage-stress depends upon both C-factor and composite mass

  • David C. Watts
  • ,
  • Julian D. Satterthwaite

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK. Tel.: +44 161 275 6621/6808; fax: +44 161 275 6710.

University of Manchester, School of Dentistry and Photon Science Institute, UK

Received 29 June 2007; received in revised form 15 August 2007; accepted 16 August 2007.

Abstract 

Objectives

To measure and then mathematically model polymerization stress-dependence upon systematic variations of C-factor (bonded/unbonded area ratio) for the Bioman instrument [1], recording stress by free cantilever-beam deflection; compliance 1.5μm/MPa.

Methods

A light-cured resin-composite (RZD103; Ivoclar) with 57% (v/v) 450nm filler was studied. Facing surfaces: glass slab and steel rod-end, constituting the Bioman test chamber, being perpendicular to the measured axial stress-direction, were varied: (a) with rod-diameters (ϕ), from 1 to 10mm in 1mm increments (with 0.8mm gap height); and then (b) with gap heights (h) in 16 steps from 0.05 to 1.50mm (with ϕ=10mm). For each h and ϕ combination, giving C-factors ranging from 0.6 to 100, shrinkage-stress was recorded for 1h from start of 40s irradiation at 600mWcm−2 for photo-polymerization at 23°C (n=3). Shrinkage-stress (Sσ) was plotted directly as functions of h, ϕ, and C and also per unit composite mass, (Sσg−1). ANOVA and Tukey's statistics were applied.

Results

Series A—diameter variation; with C-factor increasing from 0.6 to 6, gave an exact exponential decrease in Sσ from 45 to 8MPa. Series B—height variation; with C-factor increasing from 3 to 100, gave increasing Sσ from 1 to 8MPa. Since composite mass played an equally dominant role, plots of stress-variations per unit composite mass, (Sσg−1) separated these effects, confirming progressive off-axial stress-relief with increasing h.

Significance

(i) Values of h=0.8 and ϕ=10mm, recommended [1] for Bioman use, were confirmed as appropriate. Every lab instrument for measuring Sσ necessarily embodies specific C-factors and compliance values in the instrument design. (ii) Configuration (C) factor is recognized as an important parameter affecting manifestation of shrinkage-stress within restorative cavities and luting gaps. However, the restorative mass must equally be considered when translating shrinkage-science into specific clinical recommendations.

Keywords: Polymerization shrinkage, Stress, C-factor, Resin-composite

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(07)00206-0

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.08.007

Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 1-8, January 2008