« Previous
Next »
Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 1
, Pages 39-44
, January 2008
Correlation of in vitro fatigue data and in vivo clinical performance of a glassceramic material
References
- . Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:557–562
- . An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glassceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108(3):239–246
- . Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:8–19
- . Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glassceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater. 2005;21:262–271
- . A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosth. 2000;13:194–199
- . Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan–Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent. 2000;3:9–23
- . The strength of ceramics. Mater Sci Eng. 1970;6:281–298
- . The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Phil Trans R Soc Lond. 1920;221A:163–198
- . Dynamic fatigue of feldspathic porcelain. Dent Mater. 1993;9:269–273
- . Cyclic fatigue of ceramics: a mechanics approach to subcritical crack growth and life prediction. J Ceram Soc Jpn. 1991;99:1047–1062
- . Fracture mechanics principles. Dent Mater. 1995;11:111–112
- . Fatigue of dental ceramics in a simulated oral environment. J Dent Res. 1986;65:993–997
- . Influence of water vapor on crack propagation in soda-lime-glass. J Am Ceram Soc. 1967;50:407–414
- . Dynamic fatigue of glass. J Appl Phys. 1958;29:1657–1662
- . Ceramics. Berlin: Springer; 1999;
- . Lifetime prediction of ceramics: importance of the test method. Ceram Int. 1994;20:125–135
- Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Krämer N. Glassceramic inlays after twelve years: Clinical results. J Adhes Dent 2007; submitted for publication.
- . A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress 2 and the IPS Empress glass ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:297–303
- . Challenges to the development of esthetic alternatives to dental amalgam in an academic research center. Trans Acad Dent Mater. 1996;9:25–50
- . Comparison of evaluation procedures for the subcritical crack growth parameter n. J Eur Ceram Soc. 1994;13:509–519
- . Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:145–150
- . Strength-probability-time (SPT) diagram—an adjunct to the assessment of dental materials?. J Dent. 1994;22:364–369
- . Lifetime prediction of all-ceramic bridges by computational methods. J Dent Res. 2003;82:238–242
- . Lifetime prediction of CAD/CAM dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater). 2002;63:780–785
- . Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics. Dent Mater. 2000;16:226–233
- . Effects of cyclic loading on the strength of all-ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:28–37
- . Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odont Scand. 1994;52:140–147
- . Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent. 1994;22:265–272
- . Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater. 1995;11:103–110
- . Task-dependence of activity/bite-force relations and its impact on estimation of chewing force from EMG. J Dent Res. 2002;81:464–468
- . Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1336–1344
- . Materials for minimally invasive treatments. In: Roulet JF, Vanherle G editor. Adhesive technology for restorative dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence; 2001;
PII: S0109-5641(07)00045-0
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.01.011
© 2007 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Dental Materials
Volume 24, Issue 1
, Pages 39-44
, January 2008
