Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 479-485 , April 2007

Effectiveness and dentin bond strengths of two materials for reinforcing thin-walled roots

  • Xin Wu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
    • ,
  • Anna T.T. Chan

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China
    • ,
  • Ya-Ming Chen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +86 25 85031831; fax: +86 25 86516414.
    • ,
  • Kevin H.-K. Yip

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +86 852 28590286; fax: +86 852 25470164.
    • ,
  • Roger J. Smales

      Affiliations

    • Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Received 21 November 2005 ,Revised 18 February 2006 ,Accepted 9 March 2006.

References 

  1. Morgano SM, Rodrigues AH, Sabrosa CE. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin N Am. 2004;48:397–416
  2. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:565–567
  3. Manning KE, Yu DC, Yu HC, Kwan EW. Factors to consider for predictable posts and core build-ups of endodontically treated teeth. Part I: Basic theoretical concepts. J Can Dent Assoc. 1995;61:685–695
  4. Musikant BL, Cohen BI, Deutsch AS. Post design and the optimally restored endodontically treated tooth. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;24:788–796
  5. Bolhuis P, de Gee , Feilzer A. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:657–667
  6. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structural analysis in in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:476–482
  7. Mitsui FH, Marchi GM, Pimenta LA, Ferraresi PM. In vitro study of fracture resistance of bovine roots using different intraradicular post systems. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:612–616
  8. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Collard EW, Pollack MH. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972;33:952–960
  9. Cooney JP, Caputo AA, Trabert KC. Retention and stress distribution of tapered-end endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:540–546
  10. Lui JL. Composite resin reinforcement of flared canals using light-transmitting plastic posts. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:313–319
  11. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke JA. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:483–491
  12. Katebzadeh N, Dalton BC, Trope M. Strengthening immature teeth during and after apexification. J Endodont. 1998;24:256–259
  13. Salzmann JA. Orthodontics in daily practice. Philadelphia: Lippencott; 1994;p. 202
  14. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin–dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res. 1999;78:699–705
  15. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle?. J Endodont. 1992;18:332–335
  16. Tjan AHL, Whang SD. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:496–500
  17. Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater. 2002;18:596–602
  18. O’Brien WJ. Elastic modulus E. In: Biomaterials properties database. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1996;www.lib.umich.edu/dentlib/Dental_tables/Elasmod.html
  19. Denisova LA, Maev RG, Poyurovskaya IY, Grineva TV, Denisov AF, Maeva EY, et al. The use of acoustic microscopy to study the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2004;20:358–363
  20. Misra A, Spencer P, Marangos O, Wang Y, Katz JL. Micromechanical analysis of dentin/adhesive interface by the finite element method. J Biomed Mater Res. 2004;70B:56–65
  21. de Santis R, Prisco D, Apicella A, Ambrosio L, Rengo S, Nicolais L. Carbon fiber post adhesion to resin luting cement in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000;11:201–206
  22. Loney RW, Moulding MB, Ritsco RG. The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and cores and crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995;8:247–251
  23. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer J-M, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2003;19:199–205
  24. Perdigão J, Lopes M. Dentin bonding—questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:191–209
  25. Nakabayashi N, Hiranuma K. Effect of etchant variation on wet and dry dentin bonding primed with 4-META/acetone. Dent Mater. 2000;16:274–279
  26. Gaston BA, West LA, Liewehr FR, Fernandes C, Pashley DH. Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endodont. 2001;27:321–324
  27. Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Adhesion to root canal dentine using one and two-step adhesives with dual-cure composite core materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:97–104
  28. Marshall GW, Balooch M, Tench RJ, Kinney JH, Marshall SJ. Atomic force microscopy of acid effects on dentin. Dent Mater. 1993;9:265–268
  29. Ngo H, Mount GJ, Peters MCRB. A study of glass-ionomer cement and its interface with enamel and dentin using a low-temperature, high-resolution scanning electron microscope technique. Quintessence Int. 1997;28:63–69

PII: S0109-5641(06)00080-7

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.006

Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 479-485 , April 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution