Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 479-485, April 2007

Effectiveness and dentin bond strengths of two materials for reinforcing thin-walled roots

  • Xin Wu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
  • ,
  • Anna T.T. Chan

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China
  • ,
  • Ya-Ming Chen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +86 25 85031831; fax: +86 25 86516414.
  • ,
  • Kevin H.-K. Yip

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, PR China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +86 852 28590286; fax: +86 852 25470164.
  • ,
  • Roger J. Smales

      Affiliations

    • Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Received 21 November 2005; received in revised form 18 February 2006; accepted 9 March 2006.

Abstract 

Objectives

To investigate the effectiveness of two restorative materials for reinforcing thin-walled roots and their microtensile bond strengths to root canal dentin.

Methods

Twenty-one decoronated maxillary central incisor roots were root filled and the canals enlarged to leave approximately 1.0mm thick dentin walls. The roots were distributed randomly to three equal groups. Group 1 (control): a large tapered cast post-core was fabricated. Group 2 (BIS-CORE): a thick layer of dual-cured composite was placed in the post-hole before fabrication of a small-diameter tapered cast post-core. Group 3 (ChemFil Superior): a thick layer of glass-ionomer was placed, as before. Metal–ceramic crowns were fabricated for all teeth. Microtensile bond strength tests and optical and atomic force microscope observations were employed to examine adhesion between the two restorative materials and the root canal dentin.

Results

Mechanical loading (kN) demonstrated that composite 0.64 (S.D. 0.05), but not glass-ionomer 0.49 (0.05), significantly reinforced the fracture resistance of thin-walled roots, P<0.001. Microtensile bond strengths (MPa) were 21.7 (1.6) for composite and 12.9 (1.7) for glass-ionomer, P=002.

Significance

A thick intermediate layer of resin-bonded composite, sandwiched between the root dentin and a small-diameter cast Ni–Cr post or dowel, increased significantly the fracture resistance of the roots.

Keywords: Resin composite, Glass-ionomer, Microtensile bond strength, Atomic force microscopy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(06)00080-7

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.006

Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 479-485, April 2007