Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 454-460, April 2007

The effect of enamel porcelain thickness on color and the ability of a shade guide to prescribe chroma

  • F.D. Jarad

      Affiliations

    • Restorative Dentistry, Unit of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Studies, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5PS, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 151 706 5219; fax: +44 151 706 5652.
  • ,
  • B.W. Moss

      Affiliations

    • School of Agriculture and Food Science, Queen's University Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, UK
  • ,
  • C.C. Youngson

      Affiliations

    • Restorative Dentistry, Unit of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Studies, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5PS, UK
  • ,
  • M.D. Russell

      Affiliations

    • Restorative Dentistry/Special Need, Birmingham Dental Hospital (NHS Trust), St. Chads Queensway, Birmingham, B4 6NN, UK

Received 21 April 2005; received in revised form 6 December 2005; accepted 8 March 2006.

Abstract 

Objective

To test the null hypothesis that there is no color change when enamel porcelain thickness is changed and to evaluate the ability of a shade guide to prescribe chroma.

Methods

Three shades (3M1, 3M2 and 3M3) were selected from a Vitapan 3D master shade guide. Five disk specimens were prepared for each shade, consisting of three layers (opacious dentin, dentin and enamel) at thicknesses of 0.6, 0.8 and 0.6mm, respectively. The color of each disk was measured using a spectrophotometer. Enamel porcelain was reduced in thickness to 0.3mm and porcelain disks were remeasured.

Results

Reducing the enamel thickness of porcelain disk specimens significantly increased L* (p<0.05), b*, metric chroma and hue angle (p<0.001). For the three shades studied (3M1, 3M2 and 3M3) L* values were not significantly different (p>0.05) and chroma increased for 3M1 with the lowest chroma to 3M3 with the highest chroma, which is in line with the shade guide specifications. Although statistically significant (p<0.001) changes in hue angle between the three shades were small (less than 3° overall). The difference in chroma between the three shades 3M1, 3M2 and 3M3 was greatest for the thin enamel layer than the thick enamel layer.

Significance

A change in enamel thickness from 0.6 to 0.3mm resulted in a three-unit change in L* and metric chroma and a 4° change in hue angle. A change in enamel porcelain thickness will have a greater effect on higher chromatic shades than those with lower chroma. The ability of the shade guide to prescribe chroma was demonstrated but this could be offset by an anomalous enamel thickness.

Keywords: Porcelain thickness, Color, Chroma, Spectrophotometer, Shade guide

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(06)00077-7

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.001

Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 4 , Pages 454-460, April 2007