Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 279-287 , March 2007

Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite

  • Oswaldo S. de Andrade

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry/Dental Materials, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba—UNICAMP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
    • ,
  • Mario F. de Goes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry/Dental Materials, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba—UNICAMP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
    • ,
  • Marcos A.J.R. Montes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry /Dental Materials, School of Dentistry of Pernambuco—UPE, Av. Gen. Newton Cavalcanti, 1650 Camaragibe, PE 54753-220, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +55 81 3458 1186; fax: +55 81 3458 1476.

Received 31 March 2005 ,Revised 29 November 2005 ,Accepted 10 January 2006.

References 

  1. Van Noort R. Introduction to dental materials, Section II. London: Mosby; 1994;p. 89–105
  2. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63:146–148
  3. Robinson PB, Moore BK, Swartz ML. Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro. Oper Dent. 1987;12:113–116
  4. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J. Proximal adaptation and marginal seal of posterior composite resin restorations placed with direct and indirect technique. Quintessence Int. 1990;21:663–669
  5. Montes MAJR, de Goes MF, Ambrosano GMB, Duarte RM, Sobrinho LC. The effect of collagen removal and the use of low-viscosity resin liner on marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations with margins in dentin. Oper Dent. 2003;28:378–387
  6. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1636–1639
  7. Llena Puy MAC, Navarro LF, Llacer VJF, Ferrandez A. Composite resin inlays: a study of marginal adaptation. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:429–433
  8. Leinfelder KF. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:573–581
  9. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation of three inlay/onlay techniques. Oper Dent. 1990;15:129–135
  10. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent. 1997;9:108–118
  11. Fuhrer N. Restoring posterior teeth with a novel indirect composite resin system. J Esthet Dent. 1997;9:124–130
  12. Douglas WH, Fields RP, Fundingsland JA. A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems. J Dent. 2002;30:259–269
  13. Cassin AM, Pearson GJ. Microleakage studies comparing one-visit indirect composite inlay system and direct composite restorative technique. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;19:265–270
  14. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DCN. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. Dent Mater. 1989;5:388–391
  15. Burrow MF, Tagami J, Negishi T, Nikaido T, Hosoda H. Early bond strengths of several enamel and dentin bonding systems. J Dent Res. 1994;73:522–528
  16. Hasanreisoglu U, Sonmez H, Uçtasli S, Wilson HJ. Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:66–71
  17. Van DiiJken JWV, Horstedt P. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays. J Dent. 1996;24:389–394
  18. Sorensen JA, Munksgaard EC. Ceramic inlay movement during polymerization of resin luting cements. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995;103:186–189
  19. Mak YF, Lai SCN, Cheung GSP, Chan AWK, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater. 2002;18:609–621
  20. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agent: effect of bond strength. Am J Dent. 1996;9:115–119
  21. Paul SJ, Schärer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1997;17:537–545
  22. Paul SJ, Schärer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:8–14
  23. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17:144–155
  24. Reis A, Carrilho MR, Schroeder M, Tancredo LL, Loguercio AD. The influence of storage times and cutting speed on microtensile bond strength. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6:7–11
  25. Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, Davidson C. Marginal and internal adaptation of Class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement. J Dent. 2002;30:259–269
  26. Cadigiaco MC, Ferrari M, Garberoglio R, Davidson C. Dentin contamination protection after mechanical preparation for veneering. Am J Dent. 1996;9:57–60
  27. Otsuki M, Yamada T, Inokoshi S, Takatsu T, Hosoda H. Establishment of a composite resin inlay technique. Part 7. Use of a low viscous resin. Jpn J Conserv Dent. 1993;36:1324–1330
  28. Suzuki S. Clinical evaluation of a new composite crown system to eliminate postoperative sensitivity. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 2000;20:499–509
  29. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Effect of resin coating technique on dentin tensile bond strengths over 3 years. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14:115–122
  30. Swift EJ, Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent. 1996;9:100–104
  31. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2001;17:359–366
  32. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:111–121
  33. Rueggeberg FA, Margesson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1652–1658
  34. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as “filled adhesives”: literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int. 1999;30:249–257
  35. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent. 1997;25:441–458
  36. Montes MAJR, de Goes MF, Cunha MRB, Soares AB. A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in one and two coats. J Dent. 2001;29:435–441
  37. Zheng L, Pereira PNR, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent. 2001;26:97–104
  38. Ogata M, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Sano H, Tagami J. Influence of the tubules direction on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent. 2001;26:27–35

PII: S0109-5641(06)00036-4

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.028

Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 279-287 , March 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution