Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 8 , Pages 712-734 , August 2006

How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods

  • S.D. Heintze

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +423 235 3570; fax: +423 233 1279.

References 

  1. European Community. Council directive concerning medical devices. Directive 93/42 EEC 1993.
  2. FDA, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Safety tests (chemical substances, medical devices such as implants, etc.). Directive No. 21 CFR 58-1978.
  3. FDA, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guideline on general principles of process validation. No. 820 1987.
  4. European Community. Tests on chemical substances. Directive 87/18-20/EEC-1987.
  5. FDA, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) (PART 58 52 FR 33780, 1978. last revision 2004); 1978.
  6. ISO. Dental materials—guidance on testing of wear. Part 1. Wear by tooth brushing. Technical Specification 1999; No. 14569-1.
  7. ISO. Dental materials—guidance on testing of wear. Part 2. Wear by two-and/or three body contact. Technical Specification 2001; No. 14569-2.
  8. Marek M. Interactions between dental amalgams and the oral environment. Adv Dent Res. 1992;6:100–109
  9. Isacsson G, Barregard L, Selden A, Bodin L. Impact of nocturnal bruxism on mercury uptake from dental amalgams. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105:251–257
  10. Gatti AM. Biocompatibility of micro- and nano-particles in the colon. Part II. Biomaterials. 2004;25:385–392
  11. Gatti AM, Rivasi F. Biocompatibility of micro- and nanoparticles. Part I. In liver and kidney. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2381–2387
  12. Kunzelmann K-H. Verschleissanalyse und -quantifizierung von Füllungsmaterialien in vivo und in vitro. Shaker Verlag: Aachen; 1998;
  13. Anusavice KJ. Degradability of dental ceramics. Adv Dent Res. 1992;6:82–89
  14. Morris HF. Veterans Administration Cooperative Studies Project No. 147. Part IV. Biocompatibility of base metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58:1–5
  15. Genco RJ. Current view of risk factors for periodontal diseases. J Periodontol. 1996;67:1041–1049
  16. Carlsson GE, Egermark I, Magnusson T. Predictors of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders: a 20-year follow-up study from childhood to adulthood. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60:180–185
  17. John MT, Frank H, Lobbezoo F, Drangsholt M, Dette KE. No association between incisal tooth wear and temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:197–203
  18. Seligman DA, Pullinger AG, Solberg WK. The prevalence of dental attrition and its association with factors of age, gender, occlusion, and TMJ symptomatology. J Dent Res. 1988;67:1323–1333
  19. Bernhardt O, Gesch D, Splieth C, Schwahn C, Mack F, Kocher T, et al. Risk factors for high occlusal wear scores in a population-based sample: results of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:333–339
  20. Gesch D, Bernhardt O, Kirbschus A. Association of malocclusion and functional occlusion with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in adults: a systematic review of population-based studies. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:211–221
  21. Koh H, Robinson PG . Occlusal adjustment for treating and preventing temporomandibular joint disorders. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2002;
  22. Gragg KL, Shugars DA, Bader JD, Elter JR, White BA. Movement of teeth adjacent to posterior bounded edentulous spaces. J Dent Res. 2001;80:2021–2024
  23. Shugars DA, Bader JD, Phillips SW, White BA, Brantley CF. The consequences of not replacing a missing posterior tooth. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:1317–1323
  24. Bayne SC. Dental composites/glass ionomers: clinical reports. Adv Dent Res. 1992;6:65–77
  25. van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11-year follow-up. J Dent. 2000;28:299–306
  26. Granada S, Hicks RA. Changes in self-reported incidence of nocturnal bruxism in college students: 1966–2002. Percept Mot Skills. 2003;97:777–778
  27. Attanasio R. An overview of bruxism and its management. Dent Clin North Am. 1997;41:229–241
  28. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:45–64
  29. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Invest. 2003;7:63–70
  30. El-Badrawy WA, Leung BW, El-Mowafy O, Rubo JH, Rubo MH. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:162–167
  31. Ekfeldt A, Fransson B, Soderlund B, Oilo G. Wear resistance of some prosthodontic materials in vivo. Acta Odontol Scand. 1993;51:99–107
  32. CRA. Restorative resins: current generation Class 2 resin status report #3. 2-year clinical performance. CRA Newsletter 1996;20:1–3.
  33. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: in vivo wear. J Dent. 1993;21:74–78
  34. Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Erickson RL, Lambrechts P. Comparison of laboratory and clinical wear rates of resin composites. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:269–274
  35. Söderholm KJ, Lambrechts P, Sarrett D, Abe Y, Yang MC, Labella R, et al. Clinical wear performance of eight experimental dental composites over three years determined by two measuring methods. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;109:273–281
  36. CRA. Posterior full crowns 2001. Part 2. Resin crowns, 4 year clinical status. CRA Newsletter 2001;25:1–3.
  37. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21:9–20
  38. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Invest. 2003;7:71–79
  39. Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:1088–1096
  40. Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Smales RJ, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results. Am J Dent. 2002;15:403–406
  41. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29:481–508
  42. Sorenson JA, Cruz MA, Berge H-X. In vivo measurement of antagonist tooth wear opposing ceramic bridges. J Dent Res. 2000;79:172;[Abstract No. 232]
  43. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Young H, Jones J, Gibbs C, Yang M. In vivo wear of enamel by a lithia-disilicate-based core ceramic used for posterior FPDs: first-year results. J Dent Res. 2003;[Abstract 2633]
  44. Etman MK, Watson TF, Woolford MJ. Clinical performance of experimental glass-ceramic posterior crowns: 3D measurement of clinical wear. J Dent Res. 2002;[Abstract 1697]
  45. Materials ACoD. Posterior composite resins: an update. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;113:950–1.
  46. SSO . Qualitätsleitlinien in der Zahnmedizin. Bern: SSO; 2000;
  47. Schindler HJ, Stengel E, Spiess WE. Feedback control during mastication of solid food textures—a clinical-experimental study. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:330–336
  48. Kohyama K, Hatakeyama E, Sasaki T, Dan H, Azuma T, Karita K. Effects of sample hardness on human chewing force: a model study using silicone rubber. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49:805–816
  49. Ottenhoff FA, van der Bilt A, van der Glas HW, Bosman F. Control of elevator muscle activity during simulated chewing with varying food resistance in humans. J Neurophysiol. 1992;68:933–944
  50. Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, Vilmann A, Sodeyama A, Matsumoto M. Effects of ethnicity, gender and age on clenching force and load distribution. Clin Oral Invest. 2001;5:63–68
  51. Yeh CK, Johnson DA, Dodds MW, Sakai S, Rugh JD, Hatch JP. Association of salivary flow rates with maximal bite force. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1560–1565
  52. Gibbs CH, Lundeen HC, Mahan PE, Fujimoto J. Chewing movements in relation to border movements at the first molar. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;46:308–322
  53. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. In-Vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation Dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 1. Computergesteuerter Kausimulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100:953–960
  54. DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res. 1983;62:32–36
  55. DeLong R, Douglas WH. An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991;38:339–345
  56. Leinfelder KF, Beaudreau RW, Mazer RB. An in vitro device for predicting clinical wear. Quintessence Int. 1989;20:755–761
  57. Leinfelder KF, Suzuki S. In vitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999;130:1347–1353
  58. Zipprich H, Rütters CB, Lauer H-C. Kausimulation—was simulieren wir wirklich? Jahrestagung der Deutsche Gesellschaft für zahnärztliche Prothetik und Werkstoffkunde, Kiel 2004; Nr. 23.
  59. Heintze SD, Zappini G, Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators—results of a round robin test. Dent Mater. 2005;21:304–317
  60. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Serra MC. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater. 2005;21:641–648
  61. Schuurs AH, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, Duivenvoorden HJ. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part II. Statistical aspects. Int Endod J. 1993;26:44–52
  62. Sarrett DC, Soderholm KJ, Batich CD. Water and abrasive effects on three-body wear of composites. J Dent Res. 1991;70:1074–1081
  63. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1525–1529
  64. Ferracane JL, Musanje L. Effects of load and antagonist shape on wear of composite. J Dent Res. 2003;[Abstract 825]
  65. Krejci I, Lutz F, Zedler C. Effect of contact area size on enamel and composite wear. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1413–1416
  66. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Effect of antagonist diameter on in vitro wear of dental composite. J Dent Res. 2003;[Abstract 954]
  67. Krejci I, Albert P, Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res. 1999;78:713–719
  68. Kersten S, Lutz F, Besek M . Zahnfarbene adhäsive Füllungen im Seitenzahnbereich. Zürich: Eigenverlag PPK; 2001;
  69. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. A two-body frictional wear test. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1546–1553
  70. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mater. 1994;10:269–274
  71. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;38:303–313
  72. Shortall AC, Hu XQ, Marquis PM. Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing. Dent Mater. 2002;18:246–254
  73. Ferracane JL, Egge A, Heintze SD. Comparison of antagonists for producing wear of dental composites in the OHSU oral wear simulator. Academy of Dental Materials Annual Meeting; 2003.
  74. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. How heat treatment and thermal cycling affect wear of composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994;125:1467–1472
  75. Chadwick RG. Thermocycling—the effects upon the compressive strength and abrasion resistance of three composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21:533–543
  76. Yap AU, Wee KE, Teoh SH, Chew CL. Influence of thermal cycling on OCA wear of composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2001;26:349–356
  77. Schnabel C, Kunzelmann K-H, Hickel R. The influence of different abrasion media o three-body-wear of composites. J Dent Res. 1995;74;[Abstract Nr. 625]
  78. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Hofmann N, Handel G. In vitro wear of composite veneering materials. J Mater Sci. 2002;37:425–429
  79. Lewis G. Predictors of clinical wear of restorative dental composite materials. Biomed Mater Eng. 1993;3:167–174
  80. Tyas MJ. Correlation between fracture properties and clinical performance of composite resins in Class IV cavities. Aust Dent J. 1990;35:46–49
  81. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2000;16:33–40
  82. Milosevic A, Dawson LJ. Salivary factors in vomiting bulimics with and without pathological tooth wear. Caries Res. 1996;30:361–366
  83. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater. 1996;12:218–226
  84. Ferracane JL, Choi KK, Condon JR. In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 1999;S60–S66
  85. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of seven commercial composites using new in vitro wear simulator. J Dent Res. 2002;[Abstract Nr. 2683]
  86. Materials ACoD. Obstacles to the development of a standard for posterior composite resins. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:649–51.
  87. Lutz F, Krejci I. Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:185–190
  88. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 3. Korrelation mit In-vivo-Resultaten. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100:1445–1449
  89. de Gee AJ, Pallav P. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. J Dent. 1994;22:S21–S27
  90. Bryant RW. Comparison of three standards for quantifying occlusal loss of composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1990;6:60–62
  91. Perry R, Kugel G, Kunzelmann KH, Flessa HP, Estafan D. Composite restoration wear analysis: conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:1472–1477
  92. Christensen R, Bangerter V. Apparatus for automated, non-contact measurements of surface changes. J Dent Res. 1990;69:126;[Abstract 140]
  93. DeLong R, Pintado M, Douglas WH. Measurement of change in surface contour by computer graphics. Dent Mater. 1985;1:27–30
  94. Roulet J-F. Degradation of Dental Polymers. Basel: Karger; 1987;
  95. Krejci I, Reich T, Buchner W. F.L. Eine neue Methode zur dreidimensionalen Verschleissmessung. Schweiz Med Zahnmed. 1994;104:147–157
  96. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res. 1997;76:1799–1807
  97. CRA. Two-year clinical comparison of Renamel Hybrid to 5 popular Class 2 resins. CRA Newsletter 2000;24:1–2.
  98. Wendt SL, Ziemiecki TL, Leinfelder KF. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations. J Dent. 1996;24:33–39
  99. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Determination of changes on tooth-colored cervical restorations in vivo using a three-dimensional laser scanning device. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:233–238
  100. Depew TE, Sörensen JA. A pilot clinical study on the Artglass system. J Dent Res. 1998;77:900;[Abstract No. 2150]
  101. Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Vuylsteke M, Davidson CL. Quantitative evaluation of the wear resistance of posterior dental restorations: a new three-dimensional measuring technique. J Dent. 1984;12:252–267
  102. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res. 1989;68:1752–1754
  103. CRA. Posterior full crowns 2001. Part 3. 2-Year clinical performance of CAD-CAM copings & full crowns. CRA Newsletter 2001;25:1–3.
  104. Willytec. Multifunctional chewing simulator—instructions of use 2001;1–39.
  105. DeLong R, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Pintado MR. The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater. 1985;1:238–242
  106. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, DeLong R, Pintado MR. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater. 1986;2:235–240
  107. Lambrechts P, Vuylsteke M, Vanherle G, Davidson CL. Quantitative in vivo wear of posterior dental restorations: four-year results. J Dent Res. 1985;62:370;[Abstract No. 1759]
  108. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V, Vanherle G. In vivo evaluation of four posterior composites: quantitative wear measurements and clinical behavior. Dent Mater. 1986;2:106–113
  109. Krejci I. Zahnfarbene Restaurationen - Qualität. Potential und Indikationen. München: Carl Hanser; 1992;
  110. De Gee AJ, Pallav P, Davidson CL. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res. 1986;65:654–658
  111. Suzuki S, Kobashigawa A, Leinfelder KF. In vitro wear of direct and indirect nonhybrid composites. J Dent Res. 2005;[Abstract Nr. 3089]
  112. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. An in vitro evaluation of a copolymerizable type of microfilled composite resin. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:59–64
  113. Suzuki S, Nagai E, Taira Y, Minesaki Y. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:431–436
  114. Schultz S, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Handel G. Mechanical properties and wear of restorative composites. J Dent Res. 2003;[Abstract Nr. 381]
  115. Schultz S, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Handel G. Three-body wear of restorative composite materials. J Dent Res. 2003;[Abstract Nr. 957]
  116. Schultz S, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Handel G. Mechanical properties of dental restoratives and their comparative flowables. J Dent Res. 2005;[Abstract Nr. 1844]
  117. de Gee AJ, Pallav P, Werner A, Davidson CL. Annealing as a mechanism of increasing wear resistance of composites. Dent Mater. 1990;6:266–270
  118. Seghi R, Pollock M, Lannutti J. Wear resistance of various nano-structured composites. J Dent Res. 2002;[Abstract Nr. 3358]
  119. Sorensen JA, Pham M. In vitro wear of composite resins processed with various systems. J Dent Res. 2002;[Abstract Nr. 2578]
  120. Gohring TN, Besek MJ, Schmidlin PR. Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro. J Dent. 2002;30:119–127
  121. Schicht O, Göhring NT, Imfeld T. Marginal integrity and wear of new resin composites in vitro. J Dent Res. 2005;[Abstract Nr. 279]
  122. Krejci I, Lutz F, Gautschi L. Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:233–244
  123. Peutzfeldt A. Dual-cure resin cements: in vitro wear and effect of quantity of remaining double bonds, filler volume, and light curing. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995;53:29–34
  124. Kunzelmann KH, Burkle V, Bauer C. Two-body and three-body wear of glass ionomer cements. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003;13:434–440
  125. Reich SM, Petschelt A, Wichmann M, Frankenberger R. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of veneering composites and their matrices. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;69:65–69
  126. Pelka M, Ebert J, Schneider H, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Comparison of two- and three-body wear of glass-ionomers and composites. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;104:132–137
  127. Pallav P, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of shearing action of food on contact stress and subsequent wear of stress-bearing composites. J Dent Res. 1993;72:56–61
  128. Pallav P, Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Wear rates of composites, an amalgam, and enamel under stress-bearing conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:426–429
  129. de Gee AJ, Wendt SL, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of enzymes and plaque acids on in vitro wear of dental composites. Biomaterials. 1996;17:1327–1332
  130. Say EC, Civelek A, Nobecourt A, Ersoy M, Guleryuz C. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials. Oper Dent. 2003;28:628–634
  131. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JW. Hardness and in vitro wear of a novel ceramic restorative cement. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:175–178
  132. Frazier KB, Sarrett DC. Wear resistance of dual-cured resin luting agents. Am J Dent. 1995;8:161–164
  133. Venhoven BA, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. Silane treatment of filler and composite blending in a one-step procedure for dental restoratives. Biomaterials. 1994;15:1152–1156
  134. Pallav P, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL, Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. The influence of admixing microfiller to small-particle composite resin on wear, tensile strength, hardness, and surface roughness. J Dent Res. 1989;68:489–490
  135. Graf K, Johnson GH, Mehl A, Rammelsberg P. The influence of dental alloys on three-body wear of human enamel and dentin in an inlay-like situation. Oper Dent. 2002;27:167–174
  136. de Gee AJ, van Duinen RN, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res. 1996;75:1613–1619
  137. Frankenberger R, Garcia-Godoy F, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I. In vitro investigations. Am J Dent. 2005;18:23–27
  138. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:199–207
  139. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:425–430
  140. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites. Am J Dent. 1993;6:199–203
  141. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Shinkai K. Wear resistance of resin cements. Am J Dent. 1995;8:83–87
  142. Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox CF. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:74–80
  143. Suzuki S. Does the wear resistance of packable composite equal that of dental amalgam?. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16:355–365
  144. Imai Y, Suzuki S, Fukushima S. Enamel wear of modified porcelains. Am J Dent. 2000;13:315–323
  145. Ramp MH, Suzuki S, Cox CF, Lacefield WR, Koth DL. Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:523–530
  146. Ramp MH, Ramp LC, Suzuki S. Vertical height loss: an investigation of four restorative materials opposing enamel. J Prosthodont. 1999;8:252–257
  147. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. Effect of gap dimension on wear resistance of luting agents. Am J Dent. 1995;8:149–151
  148. Suzuki S. In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth. J Prosthodont. 2004;13:238–243
  149. Suzuki S. Simulated enamel wear during occlusal contact. Am J Dent. 2004;17:373–377
  150. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Katoh Y. Effect of filler size on wear resistance of resin cement. Odontology. 2001;89:41–44
  151. Taira Y, Suzuki S, Atsuta M. Wear of luting materials with titanium retainer. Am J Dent. 2001;14:81–84
  152. Young HL, Suzuki S. Wear of composite resin inlays and antagonistic enamel. Am J Dent. 1999;12:47–50
  153. Suzuki S, Cox CF, Leinfelder KF, Snuggs HM, Powell CS. A new copolymerized composite resin system: a multiphased evaluation. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 1995;15:482–495
  154. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Effect of organic peroxide additives on wear resistance of composite resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997;18:1006–10081009–11
  155. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Katoh Y. Effect of an adhesive bonding system on wear resistance of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int. 1997;28:687–693
  156. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent. 1995;8:173–178
  157. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:767–771
  158. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K. Three-body wear of light-activated composite veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:233–239
  159. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF. Localized three-body wear of six types of composite resin veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:207–213
  160. DeLong R, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL, Pintado MR. The wear of dental porcelain in an artificial mouth. Dent Mater. 1986;2:214–219
  161. Douglas WH, Delong R, Pintado MR, Latta MA. Wear rates of artificial denture teeth opposed by natural dentition. J Clin Dent. 1993;4:43–47
  162. Magne P, Oh WS, Pintado MR, DeLong R. Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:669–679
  163. DeLong R, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel opposing shaded ceramic restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:42–48
  164. Viazis AD, DeLong R, Bevis RR, Rudney JD, Pintado MR. Enamel abrasion from ceramic orthodontic brackets under an artificial oral environment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthoped. 1990;98:103–109
  165. DeLong R, Sasik C, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel when opposed by ceramic systems. Dent Mater. 1989;5:266–271
  166. Coffey JP, Goodkind RJ, DeLong R, Douglas WH. In vitro study of the wear characteristics of natural and artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:273–280
  167. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4932–4937
  168. Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Condon JR, Adey JD. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater. 2002;18:1–11
  169. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res. 1997;76:1405–1411
  170. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condon JR, Todd R. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res. 1997;76:1508–1516
  171. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater. 1999;15:262–267
  172. Freiberg RS, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite. Am J Dent. 1998;11:214–218
  173. Braga RR, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14:368–376
  174. Clelland NL, Pagnotto MP, Kerby RE, Seghi RR. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:153–157
  175. Cha HS, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Evaluation of wear resistance of dental resin composites with a 3D profilometer. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2004;71:414–420
  176. Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain. J Prosthodont. 2003;12:168–175
  177. Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and conventional ceramic restorative materials. J Prosthodont. 2001;10:8–15
  178. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Zellweger G, Ferracane JL. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites in two different wear simulators. Dent Mater. 2006;22:166–175
  179. Kern M, Strub JR, Lu XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:372–378
  180. Zantner C, Kielbassa AM, Martus P, Kunzelmann KH. Wear of aluminum oxide antagonists by commercially available composites and compomers. Am J Dent. 2004;17:285–290
  181. Zantner C, Kielbassa AM, Martus P, Kunzelmann KH. Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers. Dent Mater. 2004;20:277–285

PII: S0109-5641(06)00035-2

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.002

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 8 , Pages 712-734 , August 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution