Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 8 , Pages 702-711 , August 2006

Intra-oral restorative materials wear: Rethinking the current approaches: How to measure wear

  • Ralph DeLong

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationPresent address: Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, 16-212 Moos Health Sciences Tower, 515 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Tel.: +1 612 625 1409; fax: +1 612 626 1484.

References 

  1. Watts MW, Tan EK. Bruxism and cranial–cervical dystonia: is there a relationship?. Cranio. 1999;17(3):196–201
  2. Miura H, Miura K, Mizugai H, Arai Y, Umenai T, Isogai E. Chewing ability and quality of life among the elderly residing in a rural community in Japan. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27(8):731–734
  3. Pindborg JJ. Pathology of the dental hard tissues. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1970;
  4. Murphy TR. The timing and mechanism of the human masticatory stroke. Arch Oral Biol. 1965;10(6):981–994
  5. Archard JF. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys. 1953;24:981–988
  6. Rabinowicz E. Friction and wear of materials. New York: John Wiley; 1965;p. 167–179
  7. DeLong R, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Pintado MR. The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater. 1985;1(6):238–242
  8. Szeri AZ. In: Larson RW, Dorfman M, editors. Tribology friction, lubrication, and wear. McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1980, ISBN 0-07-062663-4.
  9. Sakaguchi RL. A biophysical analysis of the occlusal wear of dental materials. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota, 1988.
  10. Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL, DeLong R. Frictional effects between natural teeth in an artificial mouth. Dent Mater. 1985;1(3):115–119
  11. Owens S, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Palmer L, English J. Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2002;121(6):602–609
  12. Craig RG, Ward ML, editors. Restorative dental materials. 10th Ed. Mosby-Year Book Inc.; 1997, ISBN 0-8151-1920-8.
  13. Greenwood JA, Williamson JB. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc Royal Soc (London). 1966;A295:300
  14. Luke DA, Lucas PW. The significance of cusps. J Oral Rehabil. 1983;10(3):197–206
  15. Wilder AD, May KN, Leinfelder KF. Three-year clinical study of UV-cured composite resins in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(1):26–30
  16. Lutz F, Phillips RW, Roulet JF, Setcos JC. In Vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63(6):914–920
  17. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Stress-induced cervical lesions: review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:487–494
  18. Bader JD, McClure F, Scurria MS, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Case-control study of non-carious cervical lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996;2:286–291
  19. Pintado MR, DeLong R, Ko C-C, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH. Correlation of non-carious cervical lesion size and occlusal wear in a single adult over a 14-year time span. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(4):436–443
  20. Grippo JO, Simring BA, Schreiner BS. Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction revisited: a new perspective on tooth surface lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(8):1109–1118
  21. DeLong R, Sasik C, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel when opposed by ceramic systems. Dent Mater. 1985;5:266–271
  22. DeLong R, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel opposing shaded ceramic restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:42–48
  23. Peters MCRB, DeLong R, Pintado MR, Pallesen U, Quist V, Douglas WH. Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear. J Dent. 1999;27:479–485
  24. Pintado MR, Anderson GA, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:313–320
  25. Leinfelder KF, Taylor DR, Barkmeier WW, Goldberg AJ. Quantitative wear measurements of posterior composite resins. Dent Mater. 1986;2:198–201
  26. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. USPHS Publication #790-244. San Francisco: US Government Printing Office; 1971; or Ryge G. Clinical performance. In: O’Brien, W.J., Ryge, G. (Eds.), An outline of dental materials and their selection. WB Saunders Company: 1978. p. 366–369.
  27. Taylor DF, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for analyzing wear of posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1989;5(3):157–160
  28. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Rekow ED, Wilder AD, Heymann HO. Confirmation of Leinfelder clinical wear standards. Dent Mater. 1994;10(1):11–18
  29. Perry R, Kugel G, Kunzelmann KH, Flessa HP, Estafan D. Composite restoration wear analysis: conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131(10):1472–1477
  30. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Role of periodontal ligament receptors in the tactile function of teeth: a review. J Periodontal Res. 1994;29(3):153–167
  31. DeLong R, Heinzen M, Hodges JS, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res. 2003;82(6):438–442
  32. Hewlett ER, Orro ME, Clark GT. Accuracy testing of three-dimensional digitizing systems. Dent Mater. 1992;8(1):49–53
  33. Jovanovski V, Lynch E. Analysis of the morphology of oral structures from 3D co-ordinate data. Monogr Oral Sci. 2000;17:73–129
  34. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(2):228–231

PII: S0109-5641(06)00034-0

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.003

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 8 , Pages 702-711 , August 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution