Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 8 , Pages 693-701 , August 2006

How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods

References 

  1. Mair LH. Wear in the mouth: the tribological dimension. In: Addy , et al. editor. Tooth wear and sensitivity. Clinical advances in restorative dentistry. Martin Dunitz Ltd.; 2000;
  2. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuysteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res. 1989;68:1752–1754
  3. Pallav P, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of shearing action of food on contact stress and subsequent wear of stress-bearing composites. J Dent Res. 1993;72(1):56–61
  4. Wu W, Cobb EN. A silver staining technique for investigating wear of restorative dental composites. Biomed Mater Res. 1981;15:343–348
  5. Wu W, Toth EE, Moffa JF, Ellison JA. Subsurface damage layer of in vivo worn dental composite restorations. J Dent Res. 1984;63(5):675–680
  6. Mair L. Staining of in vivo subsurface degradation in composite resins with silver nitrate. J Dent Res. 1991;70:215–220
  7. Schmidlin PR, Pasqualetti T, Imfeld T, Besek M. An in vitro model for the simulation of approximal wear. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2003;113(4):427–438
  8. Wendt SL, Ziemiecki TL, Leinfelder KF. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations. J Dent. 1996;24:33–39
  9. Ehrnford L. Surface microstructure of composite resins after toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1983;41(4):241–245
  10. Momoi Y, Hirosaki K, Kohno A, McCabe JF. In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of resin-modified glass ionomers. Dent Mater. 1997;13(2):82–88
  11. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Analysis of composite type (Artglass) and different sources of polymerization light on in vitro toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion resistance. J Dent. 2000;28(5):355–359
  12. Eisenburger M, Shellis RP, Addy M. Comparative study of wear of enamel induced by alternating and simultaneous combinations of abrasion and erosion in vitro. Caries Res. 2003;37(6):450–455
  13. Takeuchi CY, Orbegoso Flores VH, Palma Dibb RG, Panzeri H, Lara EH, Dinelli W. Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):281–286
  14. Remizov SM, Pruzhanskii LIU. The effect of toothbrushes on human dental enamel and dentin wear. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 1990;(4):4–6
  15. McLey L, Boyd RL, Sarker S. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: relative degree of bristle end-rounding. J Clin Dent. 1997;8(3):86–90
  16. Rawls HR, Casella R, Mkwayi-Tulloch NJ. An in vitro and in vivo study of toothbrush bristle splaying. J Dent Res. 1993;72(5):947–952
  17. Nordbo H, Skogedal O. The rate of cervical abrasion in dental students. Acta Odontol Scand. 1982;40:45–47
  18. Joiner A, Pickles MJ, Tanner C, Weader E, Doyle P. An in situ model to study the toothpaste abrasion of enamel. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31(6):434–438
  19. Saxton CA, Cowell CR. Clinical investigation of the effects of dentifrices on dentin wear at the cementoenamel junction. J Am Dent Assoc. 1981;102(1):38–43
  20. McCabe JF, Smith BH. A method for measuring the wear of restorative materials in vitro. Br Dent J. 1981;151(4):123–126
  21. Fan PL, Powers JM, Craig RG. In vitro wear of microfilled and visible light-cured composites. J Dent Res. 1979 Nov;58(11):2116–2119
  22. Hu X, Marquis PM, Shortall AC. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82(2):214–220
  23. Hu X, Harrington E, Marquis PM, Shortall AC. The influence of cyclic loading on the wear of a dental composite. Biomaterials. 1999;20(10):907–912
  24. Winkler MM, Greener EH, Lautenschlager EP. Non-linear in vitro wear of posterior composites with time. Dent Mater. 1991;7(4):258–262
  25. Harrison A, Draughn RA. Abrasive wear, tensile strength, and hardness of dental composite resins—is there a relationship?. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;36(4):395–398
  26. Draughn RA, Harrison A. Relationship between abrasive wear and microstructure of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40(2):220–224
  27. Rice SL, Bailey WF, Wayne SF, Burns JA. Comparative in vitro sliding-wear study of conventional, microfilled, and light-cured composite restoratives. J Dent Res. 1984;63(9):1173–1175
  28. Smalley WM, Nicholls JI. In vitro two-body wear of polymeric veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56(2):175–181
  29. Burgoyne AR, Nicholls JI, Brudvik JS. In vitro two-body wear of inlay-onlay composite resin restoratives. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(2):206–214
  30. Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22(4):275–281
  31. Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22(5):349–354
  32. Nagarajan VS, Jahanmir S, Thompson VP. In vitro contact wear of dental composites. Dent Mater. 2004;20(1):63–71
  33. Kula K, McKinney JE, Kula TJ. Effects of daily topical fluoride gels on resin composite degradation and wear. Dent Mater. 1997;13(5):305–311
  34. Lappalainen R, Yli-Urpo A, Seppa L. Wear of dental restorative and prosthetic materials in vitro. Dent Mater. 1989;5(1):35–37
  35. Pilliar RM, Smith DC, Maric B. Oscillatory wear tests of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63(9):1166–1172
  36. Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res. 1991;70(3):221–225
  37. Willems G, Celis JP, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Roos JR, Vanherle G. In vitro vibrational wear under small displacements of dental materials opposed to annealed chromium-steel counterbodies. Dent Mater. 1992;8(6):338–344
  38. de Gee AJ, Pallav P, Davidson CL. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res. 1986;65(5):654–658
  39. Pallav P, Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Wear rates of composites, an amalgam, and enamel under stress-bearing conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59(4):426–429
  40. Pallav P, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL, Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. The influence of admixing microfiller to small-particle composite resin on wear, tensile strength, hardness, and surface roughness. J Dent Res. 1989;68(3):489–490
  41. de Gee AJ, Wendt SL, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of enzymes and plaque acids on in vitro wear of dental composites. Biomaterials. 1996;17(13):1327–1332
  42. Graf K, Johnson GH, Mehl A, Rammelsberg P. The influence of dental alloys on three-body wear of human enamel and dentin in an inlay-like situation. Oper Dent. 2002;27(2):167–174
  43. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JW. Hardness and in vitro wear of a novel ceramic restorative cement. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110(2):175–178
  44. Reich SM, Petschelt A, Wichmann M, Frankenberger R. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of veneering composites and their matrices. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;69(1):65–69
  45. Pallav P. Occlusal wear in dentistry. Fundamental mechanisms, clinical implications and laboratory assessment. Doctoral Thesis. Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam; 1996.
  46. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater. 1996;12(4):218–226
  47. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;38(4):303–313
  48. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res. 1997;76(7):1405–1411
  49. Freiberg RS, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite. Am J Dent. 1998;11(5):214–218
  50. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater. 1999;15(4):262–267
  51. Braga RR, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14(6):368–376
  52. Ferracane JL, Choi KK, Condon JR. In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 1999;(25):S60
  53. Clelland NL, Villarroel SC, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Simulated oral wear of packable composites. Aust Dent J. 2003;48(1):15–19
  54. Clelland NL, Pagnotto MP, Kerby RE, Seghi RR. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93(2):153–157
  55. Leinfelder KF, Beaudreau RW, Mazer RB. An in vitro device for predicting clinical wear. Quintessence Int. 1989;20(10):755–761
  56. Leinfelder KF, Suzuki S. In vitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999;130(9):1347–1353
  57. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites. Am J Dent. 1993;6(4):199–203
  58. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF. Localized three-body wear of six types of composite resin veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70(3):207–213
  59. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF. Three-body wear of four types of light-activated composite resin veneering materials. Quintessence Int. 1994;25(6):425–430
  60. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent. 1995;8(4):173–178
  61. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. In vitro evaluation of OCA wear resistance of posterior composites. Dent Mater. 1995;11(4):246–251
  62. Ramp MH, Ramp LC, Suzuki S. Vertical height loss: an investigation of four restorative materials opposing enamel. J Prosthodont. 1999;8(4):252–257
  63. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM, Blake SM. Localized wear of compomer restorative materials. Am J Dent. 2001;14(4):238–240
  64. St-Georges AJ, Swift EJ, Thompson JY, Heymann HO. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites. Oper Dent. 2002;27(4):410–417
  65. Suzuki S, Nagai E, Taira Y, Minesaki Y. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(4):431–436
  66. Imai Y, Suzuki S, Fukushima S. Enamel wear of modified porcelains. Am J Dent. 2000;13(6):315–323
  67. Suzuki S. Simulated enamel wear during occlusal contact. Am J Dent. 2004;17(5):373–377
  68. Suzuki S. In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth. J Prosthodont. 2004;13(4):238–243
  69. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100(8):953–960
  70. Krejci I, Albertoni M, Lutz F. An in-vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 2. Toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion and chemical degradation. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100(10):1164–1168
  71. Krejci I, Heinzmann JL, Lutz F. The wear on enamel, amalgam and their enamel antagonists in a computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100(11):1285–1291
  72. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100(12):1445–1449
  73. Krejci I, Lutz F, Zedler C. Effect of contact area size on enamel and composite wear. J Dent Res. 1992;71(7):1413–1416
  74. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res. 1992;71(8):1525–1529
  75. Krejci I, Albert P, Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res. 1999;78(2):713–719
  76. Lutz F, Krejci I. Amalgam substitutes: a critical analysis. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12(3):146–159
  77. Gohring TN, Besek MJ, Schmidlin PR. Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro. J Dent. 2002;30(2/3):119–127
  78. Gohring TN, Schonenberger KA, Lutz F. Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro. Am J Dent. 2003;16(4):275–282
  79. Yap AU, Ong LF, Teoh SH, Hastings GW. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(3):228–235
  80. Yap AU, Tan CH, Chung SM. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2004;29(3):269–274
  81. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, DeLong R, Pintado MR. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater. 1986;2:235–240
  82. Kunzelmann KH, Jelen B, Mehl A, Hickel R. Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent. 2001;4:171–184
  83. Shortall AC, Hu XQ, Marquis PM. Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing. Dent Mater. 2002;18(3):246–254
  84. Kaidonis JA, Richards LC, Townsend GC, Tansley GD. Wear of human enamel: a quantitative in vitro assessment. J Dent Res. 1998;77(12):1983–1990
  85. Satou N, Khan AM, Satou K, Satou J, Shintani H, Wakasa K, et al. In-vitro and in-vivo wear profile of composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 1992;19(1):31–37
  86. Nomoto R, Komoriyama M, McCabe JF, Hirano S. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2004;20:972–978
  87. Sarrett DC, Soderholm KJ, Batich CD. Water and abrasive effects on three-body wear of composites. J Dent Res. 1991;70(7):1074–1081
  88. Eisenburger M, Addy M. Erosion and attrition of human enamel in vitro. Part I. Interaction effects. J Dent. 2002;30(7/8):341–347
  89. Eisenburger M, Addy M. Erosion and attrition of human enamel in vitro. Part II. Influence of time and loading. J Dent. 2002;30(7/8):349–352
  90. Shabanian M, Richards LC. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(6):650–656
  91. Eccles JD. Tooth surface loss from abrasion, attrition and erosion. Dent Update. 1982;9:373–381
  92. Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22(4):275–281
  93. Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int. 1994;25(1):53–58
  94. Guzman AF, Moore BK, Andres CJ. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10(5):415–425
  95. Maas MC. Enamel structure and microwear: an experimental study of the response of enamel to shearing force. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991;85(1):31–49
  96. Elfick AP, Green SM, Pinder IM, Unsworth A. A novel technique for the detailed size characterization of wear debris. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000;11(5):267–271
  97. Savio JA, Overcamp LM, Black J. Size and shape of biomaterial wear debris. Clin Mater. 1994;15(2):101–147

PII: S0109-5641(06)00033-9

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.004

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 8 , Pages 693-701 , August 2006

Article Tools