Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 8 , Pages 689-692 , August 2006

Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices?

References 

  1. Söderholm KJ, Richards ND. Wear resistance of composites: a solved problem?. Gen Dent. 1998;46:256–263
  2. Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, Swartz ML, McCune RJ. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: three-year report. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;30:891–897
  3. Heymann HO, Wilder AD, May KN, Leinfelder KF. Two-year clinical study of composite resins in posterior teeth. Dent Mater. 1986;2:37–41
  4. Leinfelder KF, Wilder AD, Teixeira LC . Wear rates of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986;112:829–833
  5. Wendell JJ, Vann WF. Wear of composite resin restorations in primary versus permanent molar teeth. J Dent Res. 1988;67:71–74
  6. Lundin SA. Studies on posterior composite resins with special reference to class II restorations. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1990;73:1–41
  7. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:143–151
  8. Tyas MJ, Wassenaar P. Clinical evaluation of four composite resins in posterior teeth five-year results. Aust Dent J. 1991;36:369–373
  9. CRA Report, 20(4), 1996.
  10. Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int. 1998;29:483–490
  11. Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int. 1998;29:5–11
  12. Wilder AD, May KN, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:135–142
  13. Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, de Oliveira Carrilho MR. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results. Am J Dent. 2001;14:304–308
  14. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. . Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:185–194
  15. DeMarco FF, Rodolpho PAR, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 16 years follow-up. J Dent Res. 2005;84A:167
  16. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V, Vanherle G. . In vivo evaluation of four posterior composites: quantitative wear measurements and clinical behavior. Dent Mater. 1986;2:106–113
  17. Mair LH, Vowles RW, Cunningham J, Williams DF. The clinical wear of three posterior composites. Br Dent J. 1990;169:355–360
  18. Wilson NH, Norman RD. Five-year findings of a multiclinical trial for a posterior composite. J Dent. 1991;19:153–159
  19. Wilder AD, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Long-term clinical performance of direct posterior composites. Trans Acad Dent Mater. 1996;9:151–169
  20. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condon JR, Todd R. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res. 1997;76:1508–1516
  21. van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent. 2000;28:299–306
  22. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Invest. 2003;7:71–79
  23. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D’Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent. 2003;31:395–405
  24. Ekfeldt A, Oilo G. Wear of prosthodontic materials—an in vivo study. J Oral Rehab. 1990;17:117–129
  25. Depew T, Sorensen J. A pilot clinical study on the Artglass system. J Dent Res. 1998;77:900;[Abstract #2150]
  26. Freiberg S, Ferracane J. Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite. Am J Dent. 1998;11:214–218
  27. CRA Report, 22(10), 1998.
  28. CRA Report, 25(7), 2001.

PII: S0109-5641(06)00032-7

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.005

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 8 , Pages 689-692 , August 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution