Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 265-271 , March 2007

Resistance to fracture and structural characteristics of different fiber reinforced post systems

Received 30 September 2005 ,Accepted 18 January 2006.

References 

  1. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept de reconstitution corono-radiculaire: le composiposte (1) [new concept of coronoradicular reconstruction: the composipost (1)]. Chir Dent Fr. 1990 (Nov);60:131–141
  2. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept de reconstitution corono-radiculaire: le composiposte (2) [new concept of coronoradicular reconstruction: the composipost (2)]. Chir Dent Fr. 1990 (Dec);60:69–77
  3. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:151–157
  4. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent. 2000;13:9B–13B
  5. Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten-Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;104:605–611
  6. Sieber C, Thiel N. Eine lichtoptische Möglichkeit—Spinell/Luminaries. Quintessenz Zahntech. 1994;20:1041–1051
  7. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Scharnagl P, Leibrock A, Loose M, Handel G. Faserverstärkte Kunststoffe in der Zahnmedizin. Zahnärztliche Welt – Zahnärztliche Rundschau – Zahnärztliche Reform. 1998;107:588–592
  8. Terry DA, Triolo PT, Swift EJ. Fabrication of direct fiber-reinforced posts: a structural design concept. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13:228–240
  9. Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dent Mater. 2005;21:75–82
  10. Rosentritt M, Furer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:595–601
  11. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:39–44
  12. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000;13:15B–18B
  13. Grötsch G. Glasfaserverstärkte Kunststoffe. Allgemeines und Probleme um glasfaserverstärkte Kunststoffe (GFK). Quintessenz. 1965;16:47–49
  14. Hornbrook DS, Hastings JH. Use of bondable reinforcement fiber for post and core build-up in an endodontically treated tooth: maximizing strength and aesthetics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1995;7:33–42
  15. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:284–291
  16. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent. 2000;13:255–260
  17. Chappell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P, Eick JD. Dentinal tubule anastomosis: a potential factor in adhesive bonding. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:183–188
  18. Purton DG, Chandler NP, Qualtrough AJ. Effect of thermocycling on the retention of glass–fiber root canal posts. Quintessence Int. 2003;34:366–369
  19. Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater. 2004;20:29–36
  20. Callister WD. Materials science and engeneering: an introduction. Composites. 3rd ed.. New York: Wiley; 1997;p. 513–541 [chapter 17]
  21. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:431–437
  22. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:360–367
  23. Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of fiber orientation on the thermal expansion coefficients of fiber-reinforced composites. Dent Mater. 2003;19:471–477
  24. Piesold JU. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Eignung von Stiftsystemen mit glatter und strukturierter Oberfläche für die transdentale Fixation. Quintessenz. 1991;11:1817–1824
  25. Gu W. Interfacial adhesion evaluation of uniaxial fiber-reinforced–polymer composites by vibration damping of cantilever beam. PhD Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1997. p. 11–3.

PII: S0109-5641(06)00030-3

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.018

Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 265-271 , March 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution