Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 2 , Pages 138-144 , February 2007

Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts

  • Michael Naumann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics and Geriatric Dentistry, Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Prosthodontics and Geriatric Dentistry, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany. Tel.: +49 30 450 562 577; fax: +49 30 450 562 900.
    • ,
  • Anja Preuss

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics and Geriatric Dentistry, Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
    • ,
  • Roland Frankenberger

      Affiliations

    • Dental Clinic 1, Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

Received 25 August 2005 ,Accepted 3 January 2006.

References 

  1. Caplan DJ, Kolker J, Rivera EM, Walton RE. Relationship between number of proximal contacts and survival of root canal treated teeth. Int Endod J. 2002;35:193–199
  2. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:10–15
  3. Iqbal MK, Johansson AA, Akeel RF, Bergenholtz A, Omar R. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with the periapical status of restored, endodontically treated teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:31–38
  4. Hatzikyriakos AH, Reisis GI, Tsingos N. A 3-year postoperative clinical evaluation of posts and cores beneath existing crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:454–458
  5. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:780–784
  6. Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:256–263
  7. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TR. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:297–301
  8. Decock V, De Nayer K, De Boever JA, Dent M. Eighteen year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9:331–340
  9. Eckerbom M, Magnusson T, Martinsson T. Prevalence of apical periodontitis, crowned teeth and teeth with posts in a Swedish population. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991;7:214–220
  10. Ferrari M, Mason PN, Goracci C, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Collagen degradation in endodontically treated teeth after clinical function. J Dent Res. 2004;83:414–419
  11. 1 Gutmann JL. The dentin–root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:458–467
  12. Howe CA, McKendry DJ. Effect of endodontic access preparation on resistance to crown-root fracture. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;121:712–715
  13. Panitvisai P, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1995;21:57–61
  14. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post–core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:355–363
  15. Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J. 2002;35:575–581
  16. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod. 2004;30:289–301
  17. Sorensen J, Ahn S, Berge H, Edelhoff D. Selection criteria for post and core materials in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Proceedings of Conference on Scientific Criteria for Selecting Materials and Techniques in Clinical Dentistry, vol. 15. 2001;p. 67–84
  18. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:369–376
  19. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 1999;27:275–278
  20. King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1990;17:599–609
  21. Bateman G, Ricketts DN, Saunders WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Brit Dent J. 2003;195:43–48
  22. Isidor F, Odman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1996;9:131–136
  23. Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars. Quintessence Int. 2004;35:657–667
  24. Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson DL. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:141–145
  25. Lambjerg-Hansen H, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:882–887
  26. Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:58–64
  27. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent. 2001;29:427–433
  28. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100:953–960
  29. Kern M, Strub JR, Lu XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:372–378
  30. Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Pröschel P. Evaluation of load testing of post-endodontic restorations in vitro: compressive loading gradual cycling loading and chewing simulation. J Biomed Mater Res, Part B: Appl Biomater. 2005;74B:829–834
  31. Bolhuis HPB, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs. Am J Dent. 2001;14:286–290
  32. Paphangkorakit J, Osborn JW. The effect of pressure on a maximum incisal bite force in man. Arch Oral Biol. 1997;42:11–17
  33. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:476–482
  34. Prosthodontics TNCotAo. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms, Ed. 6. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71:72.
  35. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:135–141
  36. Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. Effect of tooth preparation height and diameter on the resistance of complete crowns to fatigue loading. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10:207–215
  37. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:565–567
  38. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:5–9
  39. Tjan AH, Greive JH. Effects of various cementation methods on the retention of prefabricated posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58:309–313
  40. Sornkul E, Stannard JG. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod. 1992;18:440–443
  41. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1985;1:108–111
  42. Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:421–427
  43. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:36–40
  44. Allen EP, Bayne SC, Cronin RJ, Donovan TE, Kois JC, Summitt JB. Annual review of selected dental literature: report of the committee on scientific investigation of the American academy of restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:39–71
  45. Kinney JH, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The mechanical properties of human dentin: a critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14:13–29
  46. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2667–2682
  47. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V, Vanherle G. The impact of composite structure on its elastic response. J Dent Res. 1986;65:648–653
  48. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:10–14
  49. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2004;20:963–971
  50. Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC, et al. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112:353–361

PII: S0109-5641(06)00006-6

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.002

Dental Materials
Volume 23, Issue 2 , Pages 138-144 , February 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution