Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 10 , Pages 942-947 , October 2006

Effect of material properties on stresses at the restoration–dentin interface of composite restorations during polymerization

  • Bill Kahler

      Affiliations

    • School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 8 8303 5439; fax: +61 8 8303 4367.
    • ,
  • Andrei Kotousov

      Affiliations

    • School of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
    • ,
  • Krzysztof Borkowski

      Affiliations

    • School of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

Received 3 June 2005 ,Revised 20 October 2005 ,Accepted 26 October 2005.

References 

  1. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21:9–20
  2. O’Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed.. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.; 2002;
  3. Arola D, Galles LA, Sarubin MF. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations. J Dent. 2001;29:63–73
  4. Davidson CL. Handling of polymerization stresses in resin-based composites. Dent News. 2000;7:9–13
  5. Misra A, Spencer P, Marangos O, Wang Y, Katz JL. Micromechanical analysis of dentine/adhesive interface by the finite element method. J Biomed Mater Res. 2004;70B:56–65
  6. Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL, Rengo S. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upperpremolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites. J Biomech. 2001;34:1269–1277
  7. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res. 1990;69:36–39
  8. Stansbury JW, Trujillo-Lemon M, Lu H, Ding X, Lin Y, Ge J. Conversion-dependent shrinkage stress and strain in dental resins and composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:56–67
  9. Wendt SL, Harris BM, Hunt TE. Resistance to cusp fracture in endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater. 1987;3:232–235
  10. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado MR, DeLong , Douglas WH. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater. 2004;20:554–564
  11. Ferracane JL. Developing a more complex understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater. 2005;21:36–42
  12. Kinloch AJ. Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology. London: Chapman and Hall; 1987;
  13. Hübsch PF, Middleton J, Knox J. A finite element analysis of the stress at the restoration-tooth interface comparing inlays and bulk fillings. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1015–1019
  14. Eldiwany M, Powers JM, George LA. Mechanical properties of direct and post-cured composites. Am J Dent. 1993;6:222–224
  15. Barink M, Van der Mark PCP, Fennis WMM, Kujis RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N. A 3D-finite element model of the polymerization process in dental-restorations. Biomaterials. 2003;24:11427–11435
  16. Al-Selehi SK, Burke T. Methods used in dentine bonding tests: an analysis of 50 investigations on bond strength. Quint Int. 1997;28:717–723
  17. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses?. J Dent Res. 1996;75:871–878
  18. De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer. Dent Mater. 1993;9:11–14
  19. Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK. Flexural creep deformation and recovery in dental composites. J Dent. 2001;29:545–551

PII: S0109-5641(05)00309-X

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.005

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 10 , Pages 942-947 , October 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution