Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 10 , Pages 903-908, October 2006

Color interaction of dental materials: Blending effect of layered composites

  • Rade D. Paravina

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials, University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston, 6516 M.D. Anderson Boulevard, DBB 465, Houston, TX 77030-3402, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 713 500 4477; fax: +1 713 500 4108.
  • ,
  • Stephen Westland

      Affiliations

    • School of Design, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • ,
  • Mikio Kimura

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials, University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston, 6516 M.D. Anderson Boulevard, DBB 465, Houston, TX 77030-3402, USA
  • ,
  • John M. Powers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials, University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston, 6516 M.D. Anderson Boulevard, DBB 465, Houston, TX 77030-3402, USA
  • ,
  • Francisco H. Imai

      Affiliations

    • Pixim Inc., Mountain View, California, USA

Received 15 April 2005; received in revised form 10 October 2005; accepted 26 October 2005.

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate the in vitro blending effect (BE) of layered resin composites related to material, shade, and differences in color and translucency between compared materials.

Methods

Specimens made of two composites (2CS, n=5) consisted of the outer composite with an outer diameter of 10mm, 4mm thick and an inner diameter of 4mm, 2mm thick for the inner composite. Thus, the inner composite was encircled by a 3mm outer composite around its circumference and backed by a 2mm thick outer composite, to simulate a dental restoration surrounded by hard dental tissues. The outer composite was Palfique Estelite (PE, C2 shade, standard shade), while the inner composites were PE A2, B2 and C2 shades and corresponding shades of Point 4 (P4), Tetric Ceram (TC) and Filtek A110 (FA) composites (batch shades). Single-composite, disk-shaped specimens (1CS) of all five shades (D=10mm, 2mm thick, n=5) were made as well. Visual color assessments were done by six observers using a lightbooth and 1 (mismatch) to 5 (perfect match) scale. The BE was calculated as a difference in scores between corresponding 2CS and 1CS. Z-scores and corresponding BE values (BEZ) were calculated. 1CS were also evaluated using a spectrophotometer.

Results

Blending effect ranged from −0.4 to 2.2, while BEZ ranged from −0.6 to 3.0. Mean visual scores for 1CS and 2CS were 1.8 (1.2) and 2.2 (1.3), respectively. BE increased with a decrease in color difference (r=0.41) and increase of translucency parameter (TP, r=0.77). High agreement was recorded among pairs of observers for both 1CS, r=0.95 (0.03) and 2CS, r=0.96 (0.02).

Significance

Blending effect is composite and shade dependent. Quantifying of blending potential of dental materials might provide useful clinical information for dental professionals.

Keywords: Resin composite, Color, Blending effect, Translucency, Double-layer effect, Color matching, Dental material

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented in part at the 82nd General Session and Exhibition of the IADR, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2004.

PII: S0109-5641(05)00304-0

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.018

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 10 , Pages 903-908, October 2006