Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 7 , Pages 671-680, July 2006

Water uptake of bonding systems applied on root dentin surfaces: A SEM and confocal microscopic study

  • Salvatore Sauro

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Timothy F. Watson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomaterials and Conservative Dentistry, King's College Dental Institute, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • Franklin R. Tay

      Affiliations

    • Oral Biology and maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-1260, USA
  • ,
  • Stefano Chersoni

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Lorenzo Breschi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Sciences, Biomaterials and Bioimplants, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
  • ,
  • Federico Bernardi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • ,
  • Carlo Prati

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39 51 27024; fax: +39 51 225208.

Received 21 March 2005; received in revised form 1 July 2005; accepted 10 August 2005.

Summary 

Objectives

Dentin adhesives have been proposed as desensitizing agents to seal exposed root dentin surfaces. Simplified ‘one-step’ dentin adhesives are highly permeable to water. The authors hypothesized that a lactic acid challenge may increase permeability of simplified adhesives and may induce fast degradation of bonding. This phenomenon adversely affects their durability as long term desensitizing agents. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability of four dentin adhesives to seal root dentin surfaces that were exposed to water and lactic acid challenges.

Methods

Four commercially-available dentin adhesives were applied with a small sponge to the root dentin of extracted human molars as de-sensitizing agents. Impression replicas of the adhesive-covered root dentin were fabricated after water immersion, as a control, and after lactic acid challenge. The replicas were examined with SEM for quantitative comparison of fluid droplet formation on the surfaces. The bonded specimens were also examined using reflected light confocal microscopy.

Results

Replicas of water droplets were observed on the adhesive surfaces, by SEM which corresponded with direct confocal observation of blisters and voids from the surface of the bonded specimens. There were significantly more water droplets from samples that were subjected to lactic acid challenge than water only immersion.

Significance

Although the dentin adhesives examined were able to cover exposed root dentin, they all exhibited fluid transudation through the polymerized adhesives. Dentin adhesives were also susceptible to surface degradation after lactic acid challenge. As simplified self-etch adhesives were highly water permeable and exhibited the most extensive surface damage, they may not be the best adhesives to be used for long-term dentin desensitization. These preliminary in vitro findings warrant validation in vivo.

Keywords: Bonding agents, Deterioration, Root dentin, Lactic acid, Water uptake, Desensitizing agents

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(05)00258-7

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.08.006

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 7 , Pages 671-680, July 2006