Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 6 , Pages 569-575, June 2006

Characterization of Portland cement for use as a dental restorative material

  • Josette Camilleri

      Affiliations

    • Department of Building and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Malta, Malta
    • Department of Conservative Dentistry and Dental Biomaterials of the Guy's, King's and St Thomas' Dental Institute, King's College London, London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Building and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Malta, Malta. Tel.: +356 2340 2894.
  • ,
  • Franco E. Montesin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Building and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Malta, Malta
  • ,
  • Richard V. Curtis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry and Dental Biomaterials of the Guy's, King's and St Thomas' Dental Institute, King's College London, London, UK
  • ,
  • Thomas R. Pitt Ford

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry and Dental Biomaterials of the Guy's, King's and St Thomas' Dental Institute, King's College London, London, UK

Received 27 January 2005; received in revised form 2 June 2005; accepted 16 June 2005.

Summary 

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of fast-setting cement formulations based on Portland cement as dental core build-up materials using two different methods of testing compressive strength and evaluation of setting times.

Methods

Four fast-setting cements based on Portland cement and their four respective densified with small particle (DSP) mortars were tested for setting time, constitution of cement by EDAX, and compressive strength using International and British Standards. Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was used as a control.

Results

All the fast-setting cements had a similar elemental composition to OPC and the setting times were less than 7min. The compressive strength of OPC was different between the two methods (P<0.001). All the fast-setting cements tested showed no difference in compressive strength regardless of the method of testing at 1 and 7 days (P>0.05), but the cylinders showed a lower compressive strength at 28 days (P<0.05). The OPC DSP mortar showed poorer compressive strength than OPC (P<0.01) at all times for cube testing but not for cylinder testing, where no difference was observed. The fast-setting DSP mortars had a lower compressive strength at 1 day (P<0.005) with both methods. At later times, there was no difference between the cements and DSP mortars for the cubes.

Significance

The pure fast-setting cements set in <7min and were not susceptible to changes in the compressive strength testing procedure at 1 and 7 days but at 28 days all the fast-setting cements had a significantly higher strength with the test using cubes (P<0.05). A reduction in strength was observed at 28 days in cylinder testing. Most of the cements tested did not show encouraging strengths, however, one of the prototype cements tested could be a prospective dental restorative material.

Keywords: Compressive strength, Dental filling, Portland cement, Setting time

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(05)00231-9

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.06.005

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 6 , Pages 569-575, June 2006