Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 250-257 , March 2006

Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities

  • Qingshan Li

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 16, Campus Kiel 24105, Germany
    • ,
  • Sören Jepsen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Periodontology, Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    • ,
  • Hans-Karl Albers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 16, Campus Kiel 24105, Germany
    • ,
  • Jörg Eberhard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 16, Campus Kiel 24105, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 431 597 2815; fax: +49 431 597 2950.

Received 6 January 2005 ,Accepted 4 April 2005.

References 

  1. Airoldi RL, Krejci I, Lutz F. In vitro evaluation of dentinal bonding agents in mixed class V cavity preparations. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:355–362
  2. Chen HY, Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured compomer restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2003;19:597–602
  3. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63:146–148
  4. Davidson CL, Davidson-Kaban SS. Handling of mechanical stresses in composite restorations. Dent Update. 1998;25:274–279
  5. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984;63:1396–1399
  6. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1636–1639
  7. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshikawa T, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 1996;21:17–24
  8. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as ‘filled adhesives’: literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int. 1999;30:249–257
  9. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. 1997;25:435–440
  10. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN, Mjor IA. Bonding of all-porcelain crown: structural characteristics of the substrate. Dent Mater. 2001;17:156–164
  11. Mixson JM, Spencer P, Moore DL, Chappel RP, Adams S. Surface morphology and chemical characterization of abrasion/erosion lesions. Am J Dent. 1995;8:5–9
  12. Eick JD, Cobb CM, Chappel P, Spencer P, Robinson SJ. The dentinal surface: its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part I. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:967–977
  13. Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:95–110
  14. Qvist V. The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo. J Dent Res. 1983;62:904–906
  15. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995;103:322–326
  16. Luo Y, Lo EC, Wei SH, Tay FR. Comparison of pulse activation vs conventional light-curing on marginal adaptation of a compomer conditioned using a total-etch or a self-etch technique. Dent Mater. 2002;18:36–48
  17. Lutz F. Krejci I and Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stress at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int. 1986;17:777–784
  18. Rupp NW. Clinical placement and performance of composite resin restorations. J Dent Res. 1979;58:1551–1557
  19. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;69:1240–1243
  20. Bertolotti RL, Laamanen H. Bite-formed posterior resin composite restorations, placed with a self-etching primer and a novel matrix. Quintessence Int. 1999;30:419–422
  21. Ferdianakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pediatric Dent. 1998;22:221–229
  22. Oberlander H, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in class-II restorations. J Clinl Oral Invest. 2001;5:102–107
  23. Payne JH. The marginal seal of class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. J Clin Pediatric Dent. 1999;23:123–130
  24. Prager MC. Using flowable composites in direct posterior restorations. Dent Today. 1997;16:66–69
  25. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissue. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing; 1998;
  26. Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, Davidson C. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement. J Dent. 2002;30:259–269
  27. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs. phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent. 1999;24:172–180
  28. Zidan O, Gomez-Marin O, Tsuchiya T. A comparative study of the effects of dentinal bonding agents and application techniques on marginal gaps in class V cavities. J Dent Res. 1987;66:716–721
  29. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:658–664
  30. Blunck U, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of compomer class V restorations in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:143–151
  31. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent. 1997;25:441–458
  32. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I. Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17:296–308
  33. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:1033–1042
  34. Dietschi D, Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhesive Dent; 1999;pp. 41–56
  35. Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Wernecke KD, Roulet JF. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations. Oper Dent. 2000;25:401–410

PII: S0109-5641(05)00165-X

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.011

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 250-257 , March 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution