Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 250-257, March 2006

Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities

  • Qingshan Li

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 16, Campus Kiel 24105, Germany
  • ,
  • Sören Jepsen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Periodontology, Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  • ,
  • Hans-Karl Albers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 16, Campus Kiel 24105, Germany
  • ,
  • Jörg Eberhard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 16, Campus Kiel 24105, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 431 597 2815; fax: +49 431 597 2950.

Received 6 January 2005; accepted 4 April 2005.

Summary 

Objectives

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal adaptation of restorative systems in combination with flowable materials as an intermediate layer in Class-V-cavities.

Methods

Thirty Class-V-cavities with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin/cementum were prepared and randomly assigned to five groups. The following five restorative systems were used: compomer, composite E, flowable compomer/composite E, composite RF and flowable composite/composite RF. The flowable materials were added between the restorative composites and the cervical margins of the cavities. Marginal and internal adaptation were quantitatively evaluated before and after thermal (2500 times between 5 and 55°C) and mechanical load cycling (25,000 times 100N) using standard SEM procedures. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-Test. The morphology of the internal restorative interfaces was also evaluated.

Results

The present study revealed that the best marginal adaptation in dentin was attained with the compomer restoration (95.8% perfect margin). The marginal adaptation of composite restorative systems was improved by the use of a flowable compomer (45.5% vs. 68.2% perfect margin in dentin) or a flowable composite (46.7% vs. 80.7% perfect margin in dentin, p<0.05) as an intermediate layer. No differences were observed between the used materials for the parameter internal adaptation.

Significance

In Class-V-cavities compomers showed the best marginal adaptation and the marginal adaptation of composite fillings could be improved by the use of flowable materials as an intermediate layer.

Keywords: Class-V-cavities, Resin composite, Compomer, Flowables

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0109-5641(05)00165-X

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.011

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 250-257, March 2006