Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 13-21 , January 2006

Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years

Received 23 September 2004 ,Revised 8 February 2005 ,Accepted 8 February 2005.

References 

  1. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:619–626
  2. Qualtrough AJE, Piddock V. Ceramics update. J Dent. 1997;25:91–95
  3. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz A, Schams A. Clinical evaluation of heat-pressed glass–ceramic inlays in vivo: 2-year results. Clin Oral Invest. 1997;1:27–34
  4. Wohlwend A, Schärer P. Die empress-technik. Quintessenz Zahntech. 1990;16:966–978
  5. Lehner C, Studer S, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Six-year clinical results of leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays. Acta Med Dent Helv. 1998;3:137–146
  6. Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass–ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:346–353
  7. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years—a clinical study. J Dent. 1999;27:325–331
  8. Stenberg R, Matsson L. Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays (Dicor). Acta Odontol Scand. 1993;51:91–97
  9. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Ceramic inlays: clinical assessment and survival rate. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:71–79
  10. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent. 1998;23:318–326
  11. Roulet J-F. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam—results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest. 1997;1:40–46
  12. Walther W, Reiss B, Toutenburg H. Longitudinal event analysis of Cerec inlays [German, Abstract in English]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 1994;49:914–917
  13. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:181–186
  14. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:199–207
  15. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD–CAM-generated ceramic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:1171–1181
  16. Isenberg BP, Essig ME, Leinfelder KF. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent. 1992;4:173–176
  17. Mörmann WH, Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:109–115
  18. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56:263–267
  19. Reiss B, Walther W. Clinical long-term results and 10 year Kaplan–Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent. 2000;3:9–23
  20. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:194–200
  21. El Mowafy O, Brochu J. Longevity and clinical performance of IPS Empress ceramic restorations—a literature review. J Can Dent Assoc. 2002;68:233–237
  22. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-colored inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent. 1995;23:329–338
  23. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:194–200
  24. Bergman MA. The clinical performance of ceramic inlays: a review. Aust Dent J. 1999;44:157–168
  25. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Bey B. Clinical and quantitative marginal analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years. Clin Oral Investig. 1997;1:163–168
  26. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3:45–64
  27. O'Reilly MM, Featherstone JD. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:33–40
  28. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restoration materials. In: USPHS Publication No. 790, US Government Printing Office; 1971.
  29. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years. Part I. Clinical behavior. Oper Dent. 2000;25:459–465
  30. Hayashi M, Wilson NHF, Yeung CA, Worthington HV. Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Invest. 2003;7:8–19
  31. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical behaviour of leucite-reinforced inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 2005;21:262–271.
  32. Magne P, Belser U. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 2003;23:543–555
  33. St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift EJ, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:551–557
  34. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent. 2000;25:324–330
  35. Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Burgersdijk RCW. Use of posterior composite resin restorations by Dutch dental practitioners. Trans Acad Dent Mater. 2001;15:190
  36. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, et al. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 2003;82:136–140
  37. Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Petschelt A. The effect of six years water storage on resin composite bonding to human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res. 2004;69B:25–32
  38. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215–235
  39. Krämer N, Pelka M, Petschelt A. Comparison of luting composites using the high viscosity cementation technique. J Dent Res. 1995;74(Special issue):537;[Abstr # 1096]
  40. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Special No):60D–76D
  41. Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:53–58
  42. Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. J Dent. 1996;24:317–323
  43. Van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent. 1994;22:265–272
  44. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites. Oper Dent. 2000;25:466–472
  45. Drummond JL, King TJ, Bapna MS, Koperski RD. Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics. Dent Mater. 2000;16:226–233
  46. Ohyama TM, Yoshinara M, Oda Y. Effects of cyclic loading on the strength of all-ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:28–37

PII: S0109-5641(05)00123-5

doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.013

Dental Materials
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 13-21 , January 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution