Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth

References 

1. Craig R. Restorative dental materials. 9th ed. 1993;pp. 473–90
2. Thompson S. Investigation into the magnitude and placement of the stress at the tooth–restoration interface using finite element analysis. MEng Thesis, Manchester School of Engineering. University of Manchester; 2002.
3. Arola D, Galles LA, Sarubin MF. A comparison of mechanical behaviour of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations. J Dent. 2001;29:63–73
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (507 KB)
   • CrossRef
4. MSC.Software Corporation, MSC.PATRAN User's Guide; 2001.
5. HKS, ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual, Version 6.2; 2001.
6. Proos K, Steven G, Swain M, Ironside J. Preliminary studies on the optimum shape of dental bridges. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2000;4:77–92
7. Mattheck C, Burkhardt S. A new method of structural shape optimization based on biological growth. Int J Fatigue. 1990;12:185–190
8. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech. 1992;25:1425–1441
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
9. Mattheck C. Design in nature: learning from trees. Berlin: Springer; 1998;
10. Wheeler RC. An atlas of tooth form. 4th ed. London: WB Saunders Company; 1969;
11. Shillingburg HT, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of tooth preparation for cast metal and porcelain restorations. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1991;pp. 205–58
12. Deligeorgi V. Aspects of management in the restoration of molar teeth. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy, University of Manchester; 2002.
13. Darendeliler SY, Alacam T, Yaman Y. Analysis of stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor subjected to various post and core applications. J Endodont. 1998;24:107–111