Light-cured lining materials: A laboratory study
References (35)
Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. VI. Forces developing in direct-filling materials during hardening
J Am Dent Assoc
(1967)- et al.
Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: Forces developing in composite materials during hardening
Am Dent Assoc
(1983) Resin-based filling materials
(1988)- et al.
Some characteristics of glass-ionomer cement lining materials
J Can Dent Assoc
(1988) - et al.
Characteristics of visible-light-activated composite systems
Br Dent J
(1984) Dental water-based cements
(1988)- et al.
Effects of 15 vs. 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology
Oper Dent
(1986) - et al.
A new laboratory method for evaluating the relative solubility and erosion of dental cements
J Oral Rehab
(1983) Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment
Oper Dent
(1984)- et al.
Thermal fatigue in teeth
J Dent Res
(1972)
Bacterial microleakage and pulpal inflammation in experimental cavities
Int Endod J
(1983)
Depth of cure of light-cured glass-ionomer cements
Quint Int
(1990)
Dentinal shear bond strength, mikroleakage, and contraction gap of visible light-polymerized linear/bases
Quintessence Int
(1991)
Restorative dental materials
Restorative dental materials
Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites
J Dent Res
(1984)
A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites
J Dent Res
(1987)
Adhesion test methods
(1990)
Cited by (21)
A resin composite material containing an eugenol derivative for intracanal post cementation and core build-up restoration
2016, Dental MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Here, the use of the same irradiation conditions and the same concentration of photoinitiator (0.5 wt% of resin mixture) in the formulation of dual-cure composites resulted in statistically similar curing depths of the experimental composites. However, the progressive reduction with the content of EgMA was attributed to the increase of opacity of these composites that reduce the light transmittance [43]. The addition of EgMA decreased the maximum curing temperature; being more pronounced for BTEg10 formulation, which exhibited a peak temperature of 31.4 °C and was significantly lower than the control and commercial material.
Development of remineralizing, antibacterial dental materials
2009, Acta BiomaterialiaRadiopacity of tantalum oxide nanoparticle filled resins
1999, Dental MaterialsAluminium radiopacity standards for dentistry: An international survey
1999, Journal of DentistryResin-modified glass-ionomers
1998, BiomaterialsAn FTIR study on the setting mechanism of resin-modified glass ionomer restoratives
1996, Dental Materials
Copyright © 1994 Published by Elsevier Ltd.