Elsevier

Dental Materials

Volume 10, Issue 3, May 1994, Pages 196-202
Dental Materials

Light-cured lining materials: A laboratory study

https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90032-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to compare seven light-cured lining materials (four glass ionomer and three non-glass ionomer), with a chemical-cured glass ionomer lining material.

Methods. Specimens were prepared and tested according to the methods prescribed in Australian/International Standards for compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, depth of cure, radiopacity, and acid erosion. Other tests were adhesion to dentin and adhesion to resin composite.

Results. Compressive strengths ranged from 48.6 MPa to 307.1 MPa, and diametral tensile strengths from 5.8 MPa to 34.8 MPa. Most of the light-cured materials were stronger than the chemical-cured glass ionomer. Depth of cure increased with increased irradiation times, with values of 0.63 mm to 6.43 mm for 60 s irradiation. Radiopacity was in the range of 0.91 mm Al to 1.07 mm Al. All materials were unaffected or only slightly affected by acid erosion. Adhesion to dentin was effectively zero for the non-glass-ionomer products. Adhesion to composite was from 6.23 MPa to 25.1 MPa, and thermocycling affected only three light-cured and the one chemical-cured glass ionomer.

Significance. All products complied with the requirements of standards, where available. Incremental placement and curing is necessary for some products. Adhesion to dentin is better with glass ionomers, whereas their adhesion to composite may be unreliable.

References (35)

  • R.M. Browne et al.

    Bacterial microleakage and pulpal inflammation in experimental cavities

    Int Endod J

    (1983)
  • F.M. Burke et al.

    Depth of cure of light-cured glass-ionomer cements

    Quint Int

    (1990)
  • R.L. Cooley et al.

    Dentinal shear bond strength, mikroleakage, and contraction gap of visible light-polymerized linear/bases

    Quintessence Int

    (1991)
  • R.G. Craig

    Restorative dental materials

    R.G. Craig

    Restorative dental materials

  • C.L. Davidson et al.

    Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites

    J Dent Res

    (1984)
  • J.P. DeWald et al.

    A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites

    J Dent Res

    (1987)
  • Draft Technical Report 11405

    Adhesion test methods

    (1990)
  • Cited by (21)

    • A resin composite material containing an eugenol derivative for intracanal post cementation and core build-up restoration

      2016, Dental Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Here, the use of the same irradiation conditions and the same concentration of photoinitiator (0.5 wt% of resin mixture) in the formulation of dual-cure composites resulted in statistically similar curing depths of the experimental composites. However, the progressive reduction with the content of EgMA was attributed to the increase of opacity of these composites that reduce the light transmittance [43]. The addition of EgMA decreased the maximum curing temperature; being more pronounced for BTEg10 formulation, which exhibited a peak temperature of 31.4 °C and was significantly lower than the control and commercial material.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text